SBIR/STTR Research Award

Additive manufacturing of Liquid Rocket Engine Components

Award identifier 71171aa6d0dac7239637c319678c34138c7a97a12b242005610c60f2433b72d9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,973

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Mound Laser & Photonics Center, Inc.
Proposal award date
2014-08-20
Contract end date
2015-05-22
UEI
HLL3FPWKBJK3
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-087

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Manufacturing of aerospace components requires high precision, complexity, and the ability to perform in harsh environments, thus resulting in low production rates and compromises of efficient-complex designs. Unfortunately, fabrication materials of liquid rocket engines, such as copper alloys, are not immensely established in additive manufacturing and better approaches are needed to overcome the obstacles associated with highly conductive materials. Applications of green lasers in laser welding has resulted in increased absorption, repeatability, and uniform heating, but has yet to be qualitatively assessed in additive manufacturing. Input from Continuous Cooling Transformation (CCT) diagrams, thermo-mechanical boundary conditions, 3-Dimensional Finite Volume (3DFV) methodology, and part geometry in the form of an STL file, will be utilized in University of Louisville"s (U of L) Dislocation Density based Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Model (DDCP-FEM) to predict local and global strengths, grain morphologies, and other layer-by-layer interfacial characteristics. By employing this model using Mound Laser & Photonics Center"s (MLPC) selective laser melting (SLM) development cell, the model"s parameters can be experimentally tested, validated, and used as input for the iterative model. Upon validation between model and development cell, a small liquid rocket engine component will be fabricated using the optimal laser parameters determined by the model. BENEFIT: Due to the low production rates, cost, and difficulties associated with manufacturing aerospace components, the proposed work would provide savings in cost and time for optimization and fabrication of liquid rocket components. Also, new innovation will be investigated in the field of additive manufacturing with the application of a green laser and copper alloys in selective laser melting (SLM). The time savings for engineering development in the form of rapid prototyping of designs as well as complex geometries that do not lend themselves to conventional machining techniques would greatly benefit both commercial and military applications

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

36 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2015). Reported award amounts total $11,357,971. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.