SBIR/STTR Research Award

Additive Produced Low-Cost Liquid Engine Injector

Award identifier 04aac1e09395609f8c518775c512e71094e0f66b089b8bfe762584bc52480413Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,587

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Microcosm, Inc.
Proposal award date
2014-06-18
Contract end date
2015-03-16
UEI
MMB2PY4G4AB5
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-087

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Microcosm, in cooperation with Aerojet Rocketdyne and Sierra Engineering, proposes to develop a LOX/kerosene swirl injector with a body of Inconel 625 deposited onto a copper faceplate. The post-processing includes stress relief and heat treatment. The copper alloy selection plus the Inconel is critical to enable Inconel post-processes without significant effects. A copper faceplate and the bi-metallic 625 body will be produced in Phase I and tensile testing and metallography will be performed. A swirl injector developed in Phase I will be produced in Phase II, with the preliminary engineering completed in Phase I. This effort is to perfect the process of the bonding of the copper with Inconel and to evaluate the best approach for the injector fabrication. This effort will focus on the process and the expected cost saving using the additive manufacturing (AM) process versus the typical machined process. The process will be analyzed relative to issues of stress and thermal conductivity for a properly performing injector and the resulting information provided as a satisfactory capability for subsequent production of various sized injectors. AM allows for subsequent cost and time savings for future, complex, low-volume production that need the use of dissimilar materials. BENEFIT: The creation of additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to reduce cost and provide the ability to produce complex parts in small volume at potentially significantly lower cost in both the initial development as well as in production by reducing tooling and challenging assembly. The ability to produce components that incorporate dissimilar materials in these stressful environments is a significant step in the use of AM. The AM development of this SBIR will provide DoD, and non-DoD entities, the ability to create and produce components that are far less expensive and may allow old designs of components no longer available to be reproduced. Many of the older as well as new components need the ability to integrate dissimilar metal materials. The AM as developed in this SBIR can significantly increase the number of new components that can be produced using AM, and allow many companies improved bottom line profits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

89 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2017). Reported award amounts total $32,972,215. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.