SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved AFSCN FCT Simulator

Award identifier 0843d757e414664bddf879d2fdae035605584b085bb7e7db5760c168bf6b95d4Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,859

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Braxton Technologies, LLC
Proposal award date
2014-07-08
Contract end date
2015-03-30
UEI
HV36BGW8JDH5
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-107

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Braxton Technologies leverages our nearly 20 years"experience working with the AFSCN to accomplish the research for the Improved AFSCN Factory Compatibility Test Simulator. Our specific experience includes our Commercial Off-the-Shelf product, AceSIM, which is one of two products approved to validate a Satellite Operations Center"s (SOC) ability to connect to the AFSCN. The GPS program relies heavily on AceSIM for validation, testing and rehearsals, and it is the critical component of our approach. Overall, our method is to provide an FCT simulator equipped with as much software as possible; reducing the procurement and maintenance costs of the hardware, reducing the footprint to increase the transportability, and reducing the system complexity to eliminate the need for onsite expert operations support. Braxton typically addresses engineering problems by employing prototyping techniques. We propose a prototyping approach to validate our research, and we can accomplish the analysis and the prototype within the cost and schedule parameters levied by the SBIR program. The Air Force can use the prototype to validate the merits of advancing the research. BENEFIT: Braxton anticipates several benefits of a software based Factory Compatibility Testing (FCT) capability. First, a significant reduction in cost can be achieved with a software simulation over the current hardware heavy implementation of the existing Automated Remote Tracking Station (ARTS) and Remote Block Change (RBC) Transportable Space Test and Evaluation Resources (TSTRs). Second, the system will be easier to transport and will require fewer personnel to operate. Third, the system will be less costly to sustain with fewer hardware components. Fourth, by reducing the cost, more satellite programs will be able to conduct Air Force Satellite Control Network (AFSCN) compatibility testing prior to launch, reducing potential on-orbit failures. From a commercial standpoint, there were over 200 satellites launched in 2013. The proposed software based FCT could be tailored to simulate commercial satellite ground networks and perform FCT for all satellites prior to launch, or validate multiple ground networks for a single satellite that plans to get support from more than one ground network.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2020). Reported award amounts total $8,630,914. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.