SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved AFSCN FCT Simulator

Award identifier 0207be7c4df13b763a7d06a7c22fee76a7fed01f64d3983048403c644f0de274Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,988

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TAU TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2014-07-08
Contract end date
2015-03-30
UEI
NJ8LSUUYNHB1
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-107

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This Phase I Proposal addresses the need for an innovative, cost-effective approach to performing Air Force Satellite Control Network (AFSCN) compatibility testing of satellites at the factory integration facility. Factory Compatibility Testing (FCT) is not required by Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), but is highly recommended. FCT verifies AFSCN ability to command and control a satellite prior to shipment to the launch base. Current FCT is performed by the Transportable Space Test and Evaluation Resource (TSTR), a system originally designed to function as a replacement AFSCN remote tracking station (RTS) in the event of an RTS failure or maintenance outage. The TSTR system is prohibitively large and expensive to ship to satellite factory locations and requires specialized expertise to operate. A compact FCT system, using advanced signal processing technologies and identical in function to AFSCN ground stations, would provide significant benefits to all AFSCN-supported space programs. Early compatibility issue detection is highly desirable--elimination of these issues at the contractor facility can be accomplished in an efficient manner given on-site availability of satellite-specific engineering expertise and specialized test equipment. An advanced FCT system could save significant satellite pre-launch test costs and would free up critical AFSCN hardware and personnel. BENEFIT: By greatly reducing or eliminating hardware and driving equipment requirements into the digital domain, satellite command and control can be performed from virtually any location with small, highly capable systems. With the appropriate systems engineering, advanced technologies-based satellite command and control capabilities can be incorporated into a new generation of transportable remote tracking station systems capable of deployment to any location with relative ease compared to current transportable systems. These next generation ground stations could provide much needed support to operationally responsive space capabilities that support the warfighter. Extensive networks for satellite control can be established for a fraction of the cost previously seen in networks like the AFSCN. Potential commercial applications of the technologies demonstrated in this effort include the potential for small, low cost transportable satellite command and control ground stations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

51 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2024). Reported award amounts total $25,272,788. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.