SBIR/STTR Research Award

New Non-Carbonate Organosilicon Enhanced Safety High Temperature Electrolyte

Award identifier 1d80f80a6de40cda8db14f666157a0749552e86704aaba88645a68b94ee9cc23Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$154,494

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2014

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Silatronix
Proposal award date
2014-06-09
Contract end date
2015-03-08
UEI
U9MPDLLVLWD9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001046
Topic code
07a

Research abstract

A major factor impacting development of Liion batteries for vehicles is the effect of elevated temperature ( & gt;50C) on battery life. Calendar and cycle life degrade at elevated temperatures due to degradation processes involving the interaction of the salt, solvents, and electrodes. Safety is undermined by use of high vapor pressure and low flash point volatile carbonate solvents. Overall, development of Li-ion batteries for vehicles, including enabling of high voltage cathode materials, requires new solvents and salts with electrochemical and thermal stability and safety characteristics that are beyond the capabilities of current state-of-the-art commercial electrolytes. In this proposal, a new non- carbonate Liion battery electrolyte will be developed by combining advanced generation organosilicon solvents with a lithium imide chemistry system. The organosilicon solvents are thermally and electrochemically stable with vapor pressures significantly lower than linear carbonates commonly used in Li-ion batteries. The use of high stability imide salts is enabled by a new current collector technology that solves the aluminum corrosion issue. By integrating an organosilicon solvent with lithium imide salts into an electrolyte, improved wide temperature range performance, enhanced safety, and the potential to integrate these advantages into higher energy Li-ion systems (i.e., higher voltage cathode, higher capacity anode) will be achieved. In Phase 1, we will focus on optimizing a new electrolyte for use in high energy density cells at elevated temperatures ( & gt;55C). Electrolytes will be characterized for electrochemical performance and thermal and electrochemical stability. Their interaction and safety profile with high energy density cathode and anode materials will be evaluated. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Success of this program will lead to lower cost and better performing Li-ion batteries for electric vehicles to support commercialization. Overall system cost will improve due to increased energy density and simplification of thermal management systems. Abuse tolerance of the system will increase as the new electrolytes will have lower vapor pressure and better stability at high temperature.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2014). Reported award amounts total $1,550,379. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.