SBIR/STTR Research Award

Find substitute for Methylene Chloride in depaint operations at Hill AFB

Award identifier a422a861b0a8f7b1ca05409eba93398e8c4b350bc9b684c4967638aef6e2c70aAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,525

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
MARK G. MILLER, INC
Proposal award date
2013-09-18
Contract end date
2014-06-17
UEI
JCJVMV9BD1T1
Solicitation number
2013.1
Topic code
AF131-198

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This effort seeks to identify an effective paint remover that does not contain Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) and does not interfere with the metal removal process at the Hill Air Force Base Industrial Waste Water Treatment Plan (IWTP) while also meeting mil-spec requirements for aircraft landing gear maintenance. Aircraft maintenance activities generally involve disassembling major components of an aircraft, cleaning, degreasing, and coating removal (paint stripping). Methylene Chloride (MeCl) has been a long standing, effective paint stripping chemical used by the aerospace industries. However, MeCl is one of the toxic chemicals regulated by OSHA and a HAP regulated by EPA under the aerospace National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). Utilizing a systems engineering approach, SES will conduct a rigorous requirements analysis, followed by a comprehensive investigation of viable alternatives to MeCl containing paint removers. SES will conduct a screening analysis to ensure compatibility with the IWTP followed by bench-scale testing using government furnished condemned/cut landing gear components/segments. SES will then complete a comprehensive feasibility analysis to identify the best and most promising alternative for paint removal that does not contain HAPs, interfere with IWTP operations, and has the ability to conform to Military Specifications for coating removal. BENEFIT: A new paint removal alternative that can be successfully implemented at Hill AFB, especially one that will also eliminate the need for a media blast process following chemical immersion, will likely be suitable to most other paint removal operations. The outcome of this project is anticipated to enable Hill AFB to stay ahead of and successfully meet future regulatory restrictions, improve worker safety, and reduce environmental impacts while meeting production and performance requirements. In addition, an alternative chemical that does not contain chelators may allow the maintenance facilities to discharge spent process solutions to the IWTP instead of disposing them as a hazardous waste. The same solution may also be adopted by other landing gear maintenance facilities in private aerospace industries worldwide.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2023). Reported award amounts total $7,679,578. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.