SBIR/STTR Research Award

Solids Handling System for Biomass Conversion

Award identifier a6b8f9f57dd0b5fe6857c3492ed2914ebb523207b8242bf6be5ab0d98091ca44Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,871

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ALTEX TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2013-06-10
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LVHYQFMMY538
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000801
Topic code
03b

Research abstract

To produce drop-in biofuel from lignocellulosic biomass materials at prices competitive to fossil fuels requires consistent and reliable solid biomass feeders for pressurized reactors. Experience with coal has not been reliable, and the lower density and more irregular configurations of raw biomass create even more feed problems. Preprocessing to create a more dense and consistent feed can help, but costs are high. New preprocessing methods are required to improve the feeding to pressurized reactors. Furthermore, if these methods could enhance biomass handling, storage and transport from the field, and thereby reduce costs, this innovation would be highly desired. General statement of how this problem is being addressed In the proposed Densified Biomass Feed process, a consistently sized and dense biomass feed is used with novel feed equipment to reliably transport solids into pressurized reactors, and then optimally size the material for compatibility with a range of conversion reactors. Besides allowing consistent feeding of pressurized reactors, the densified biomass has handling, storage and transport advantages over raw biomass and a considerable cost advantage over alternative approaches. Under the proposed project, available densification and sizing equipment will be integrated and tested to show how biomass can be reliably fed into pressurized reactors, and then optimally sized for the reactor of interest. Three biomass materials of interest will be tested. Analysis will then determine the performance and estimated cost of the approach when applied to full scale biofuels plants. Of particular interest will be how the proposed process can support the under development low cost Biomass to Fuel end-to-end drop-in liquid fuel (eg. Gasoline) process. One Biomass to Fuel conversion plant with the Densified Biomass Feed innovation can produce 23 million gallons of synthetic gasoline each year. Assuming that all of the 500 million tons/year biomass is processed approximately 33 billion gallons of fuel would be produced, valued at $73 billion per year. Greenhouse gases would be reduced by 291 million tons per year. The Biomass to Fuel low fuel production cost of $1.38 per gallon will drive the realization of these benefits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

117 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2025). Reported award amounts total $33,304,403. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.