SBIR/STTR Research Award

Isogeometric Analysis for Nuclear Engineering

Award identifier cc8fb6be32fd92ea044444420cecbfe73efca37d3fe1b1358fdcaa1b39f88514Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$231,497

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Coreform Inc.
Proposal award date
2019-02-19
Contract end date
2019-12-18
UEI
J1ANDWSEKAK3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001940
Topic code
03b

Research abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is severely underutilized in the mining industry. The complexity of the physics and the geometry of mining problems is not suitably handled by the faceted mesh descriptions commonly used in other industries, such as automotive and aerospace. Furthermore, the time required to convert computer-aided design (CAD) files and geologic survey data to FEA is prohibitively long, commonly taking several weeks. Consequently, mine operators commonly reject using FEA for critical applications, instead relying on rules of thumb and observations to make decisions that impact mine investments that cost hundreds of millions of dollars. This results in less than optimal mining environments. The objectives proposed in this project will return more accurate simulation results, streamline the CAD design/FEA simulation workflow, and accelerate simulations by leveraging isogeometric analysis (IGA). In previous work, IGA paradigms have produced simulations up to 500 times faster. The proposed work will leverage and improve DOE Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR)-funded software to bring this fundamentally new approach to simulation to the mining sector. IGA enhances FEA by using a CAD description directly in the analysis. This eliminates defeaturing and mesh generation steps while improving accuracy. A patent-pending break- through called U-splines is key to successfully using IGA in this manner. U-splines are a geometric representation suitable for both CAD and FEA. During this SBIR Phase I project, ASCR-funded codes PetSc, Zoltan, and Paraview will be leveraged in the research and development of a toolset to apply IGA to a challenging mining simulation problem: load capacity tests of steel arch mining supports. The developed toolset will shorten the time required to complete mining simulations, and increase confidence in their results. This will lead directly to the potential for greater mine safety and more accurate fracturing prediction for fracking. This proposal builds off other SBIRs previously awarded to bring the power of IGA to the automotive and defense industries. These industries share requirements and are traditionally served by the same CAD/FEA software used by mining, and the differences will be addressed in this proposal.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

32 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2025). Reported award amounts total $19,275,190. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.