SBIR/STTR Research Award

1 MW CW 704 MHz Elliptic Beam Inductive Output Tube (EBIOT)

Award identifier 40ede4e690423488383259e16f0e5b55d0a166ea400f6fd50301596d7dbae4f6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Beam Power Technology, Inc.
Proposal award date
2013-02-19
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000760
Topic code
41 b

Research abstract

There is a need to develop high-efficiency, high-power rf sources for current and future synchrotron radiation light sources, free electron lasers, and spallation neutron source user facilities. At present, conventional circular-beam klystrons and inductive output tube (IOTs) are the technologies of choice for accelerators for physics research and applications. While a commercially-available, conventional, circular-beam IOT provides lower operating voltage, smaller size, and higher efficiency than a klystron, its output power is less than 100 kW. Beam Power Technologys innovative elliptic-beam IOT (EBIOT) will overcome the power limitation. Additionally, the efficiency of the elliptic-beam IOT interaction operating at a low voltage will be comparable to that of the conventional circular-beam IOT operating at a high voltage, which is 60% to 70%. Beam Power Technology (BPT), Inc. proposes to continue the study of megawatt-class continuous-wave (cw) elliptic-beam inductive output tubes that has been started with DOE Phase II SBIR grants SC-0000850 and SC-0000851. The proposed SBIR effort will be aimed at a 1 MW cw EBIOT at 704 MHz. The Phase I technical objectives include: (1) theoretical modeling and concept design of a gridded elliptic diode; (2) theoretical modeling and concept design of the elliptic-beam system; and (3) concept design of the proposed EBIOT. Phase II will consist of completion of the engineering design, and fabrication of the vacuum envelope of the proposed EBIOT. Additional resources will be needed to build and test the focusing magnetics and to test the completed EBIOT. The Phase II efforts will be carried out in collaboration with Argonne National Laboratory under the support of a consortium of vendors and suppliers specializing in the manufacturing of microwave devices. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The proposed studies of a 1 MW cw 704 MHz elliptic beam IOT will further establish the figure of merit for megawatt-class continuous-wave elliptic-beam inductive output tubes. The demonstrations of elliptic-beam IOTs at higher power and higher efficiency/lower voltage will produce a new class of high-power, high-efficiency RF sources for the physics accelerator community. As a highly efficient device, elliptic-beam IOTs have the potential to replace conventional circular-beam klystrons, circular-beam IOTs and possibly multi-beam high-order- mode (HOM) IOTs for accelerator applications requiring highly efficient high power RF sources at or below 1.3 GHz. Furthermore, elliptic-beam IOTs have the potential to replace conventional circular-beam IOTs which are widely used for television broadcasting.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.