SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Density, High Efficiency Electrical Power Generation

Award identifier f0576feb86040f2967ab3d15e539202957c68ca4c54861cc2f32ab0bd35c5138Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$903,550

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
PC KRAUSE & ASSOCIATES INC
Proposal award date
2012-12-28
Contract end date
2017-12-30
UEI
SJR4NTU7XBE4
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
N103-207

Research abstract

State-of-the-art electrical starter/generator (ES/G) systems have become increasingly complex in design and integration due to significant power-demand increase in more electric aircraft initiatives such as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). They must provide high performance and high efficiency with limited active cooling availability. In order to satisfy the power demands and harsher environments anticipated in military and civilian aircraft platforms, new technologies must be investigated that allow significant platform-level performance improvements, including increased power density, increased efficiency, and utilization of cooling media with higher inlet temperatures. To address these challenges, PC Krause and Associates (PCKA) is developing a new generator technology that reduces temperature limitations associated with traditional synchronous generator designs. This new technology, called the ac-field electrical synchronous generator (ACESG), can operate at significantly elevated temperatures without sacrificing output power capability. Such a high operating temperature has several advantages: 1) temperature capabilities of cooling media, such as fuel and oil, can be better utilized, 2) heat can be radiated and convected into the environment, and 3) direct integration of the ACESG at the turbine engine becomes possible. All these advantages will result in significant reduction of active cooling, thus reducing size and increasing power density of the overall ES/G system. In the Phase I effort, PCKA has demonstrated the feasibility of the ACESG's electromagnetic and thermal concepts with modeling and simulation. It was shown that the elevated cooling media temperatures could yield a significant size and performance reduction in cooling loop components such as pumps and heat exchangers while improving overall aircraft performance. In the Phase II effort, PCKA will demonstrate the ACESG technology in a hardware prototype (TRL 4) and evaluate the technology impact on the JSF aircraft in a comprehensive cost / benefit study. If successful, PCKA will transition the ACESG technology to DoD programs under Phase III contracts and/or commercial applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

108 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2025). Reported award amounts total $57,862,355. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.