SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Density, High Efficiency Electrical Power Generation

Award identifier ebc48b1f079e46dddc70d9007a3eb116dddf1fcfcf07e3779f74dbd10ba5b027Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$80,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
PC KRAUSE & ASSOCIATES INC
Proposal award date
2011-01-14
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SJR4NTU7XBE4
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
N103-207

Research abstract

Electrical starter/generators (ESGs) have become increasingly complex in design and integration due to significant power demand increases in more electric aircraft initiatives such as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). These new ESG systems must provide high performance and high efficiency with limited active cooling availability. In order to satisfy the power demands and harsher environments anticipated in JSF block upgrades or future military and civilian aircraft platforms, new technologies must be investigated that allow significant performance improvements with increased power density and higher operating temperatures. To address these requirements, PC Krause and Associates (PCKA) is developing a new generator technology that removes temperature limitations associated with traditional synchronous generator designs. This new technology, called the ac-field electrical synchronous generator (ACESG), can operate at temperatures of 500 degrees Celsius and beyond without sacrificing output power capability. Being able to operating at such temperatures has significant advantages: 1) active cooling oil with much higher inlet temperatures can be utilized, 2) heat can be radiated and convected into the environment, and 3) direct integration of the ACESG at the turbine engine becomes possible. All these advantages will result in significant reduction of active cooling, thus reducing size and increasing power density of the ESG system. In the Phase I effort, PCKA will utilize high-fidelity electrical, thermal, and mechanical modeling and simulation to design and optimize the ACESG to JSF ESG specifications. Appropriate high-temperature material characteristics will be considered in the design process to ensure a viable design. At the end of the Phase I effort, the goal is to demonstrate the feasibility and capabilities of the ACESG with a detailed assessment of thermal and electrical performance compared to the existing JSG ESG. If the Phase I effort is successful, PCKA will demonstrate a hardware prototype in the Phase II. If successful, PCKA will transition the ACESG technology to DoD programs under Phase III contracts and/or commercial applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

108 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2025). Reported award amounts total $57,862,355. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.