SBIR/STTR Research Award

Compact Type I Space Encryption Hardware

Award identifier f3fc464743f62b8c4c24cc7a7d779bccdb911aefa64dda38efb11d9087b187d1Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,998

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Innoflight, Inc.
Proposal award date
2012-07-10
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
KR35JNZWXF97
Solicitation number
2012.1
Topic code
AF121-070

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: DoD Type 1 encryption is almost always required for any space demonstration or mission and thus an incredibly key technology for space systems. When small satellites (ORS, tactical s/c, CubeSats, etc.) are considered, the technology becomes even more critical since Size, Weight and Power (SWaP) are at such a premium. Currently, there are no Type 1 certified encryption units that are small enough for use on CubeSat-size space systems, which greatly restricts the utility of their architecture. Over the past several years, Innoflight has developed a series of Encryption Control Unit (ECU) prototypes for CubeSat through MiniSat applications. This development has culminated with the production of the first Innoflight Miniature End Cryptographic Unit (MECU). This highly integrated"smart"component is based on National Security Agency (NSA) Suite B cryptography using the AES256 algorithms. This first non-certified flight MECU is scheduled to fly on an Air Force weather nanosatellite, SENSE, early in CY2013. In this proposed SBIR project, Innoflight is leveraging multiple efforts both internally and externally to build on this existing development by updating and completing Type 1 certification of the MECU, optionally available with an integrated CCSDS/AFSCN-compatible transceiver, by the conclusion of Phase 2. BENEFIT: Anticipated Benefits: 1) Provide a low SWaP Type 1 certified cryptographic unit for small spacecraft by the end of Phase 2 2) Provide an integrated Radio Aerospace Vehicle Equipment (AVE) that is compatible with existing ground networks, including both AFSCN / SGLS and CCSDS ///// Potential Commercial Applications: 1) The MECU can be used to provide encryption or a full secure communications system for DoD CubeSats and virtually any SmallSat 2) The MECU also can be used for NASA small spacecraft, which represent national assets that require secure communications 3) Some commercial small space missions also will be interested in low-SWaP secure communications systems such as that provided by the MECU 4) Launch vehicles and missiles can utilize the MECU and integrated radio to provide secure communications at Low SWaP as well 5) This technology is directly applicable to similar remotely operated vehicles such as UAVs

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

54 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2021). Reported award amounts total $32,534,020. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.