SBIR/STTR Research Award

Miniaturized Interferometric Star Tracker for Cubesats (C-MiST)

Award identifier 0ce0dd36d8eb4a86d748ce800a6dc6efd09dbaa36d461ac43392453a54f5151eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,971

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Optical Physics Company
Proposal award date
2012-04-12
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NNMCZN2CS7D9
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-091

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Optical Physics Company (OPC) is proposing to design and build a flight ready miniature interferometric star tracker unit for cubesats (C-MiST). C-MiST will be a stand-alone device with its own processor, built in software and a space plug-and-play architecture (SPA) compliant interface. OPC has been developing the interferometric star tracker concept under SBIR contracts funded by both the Air Force and MDA. The Navy has also funded two different applications of this tracker technology. Current interferometric star tracker technology maturity is TRL 4. During the first phase of this project, OPC proved the feasibility of the specific C-MiST design by analysis and simulation. During the Phase II project, the C-MiST design will be finalized with all components specified so they can be procured or built cost-effectively using available tools. C-MiST hardware includes the optics, the read-out and processor electronics, and the mechanical enclosure including sunshade. These parts will be assembled into a complete C-MiST unit and subjected to both laboratory and field tests to verify flight readiness. Starfield image processing modules embedded in flight software and a SPA-compliant cubesat interface will be coded and tested. At the end of the Phase II project, C-MiST will be delivered to AFRL. BENEFIT: OPC is building three product lines around its interferometric star tracker technology. These product lines are star trackers for spacecraft guidance, navigation and control, sensors for ISR missions for tracking dim objects of interest, and GPS independent navigation and guidance on airborne platforms. The hardware and software developed for the self contained C-MiST package will benefit all three product lines. At the national level, any star tracker development project should be aimed at reviving the domestic manufacturing base for this device which has been waning in the United States. OPC has been investing in star tracker technology development with the goal of becoming a star tracker device manufacturer. OPC is already working on realizing this vision and has formulated a funding scenario to reach this goal.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

70 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2021). Reported award amounts total $35,389,096. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.