SBIR/STTR Research Award

Mid-Infrared Fiber Bundle Imager

Award identifier 040ff7ea815dfdc9f64bd27bde433f3c1421f03168f8110568bfe7f74e68e37fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
IRFLEX CORP
Proposal award date
2012-04-02
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YGEHLWEBR1F8
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-216

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Infrared cameras for thermal imaging applications can operate between 2-14 microns. These cameras produce a thermal image using two-dimensional arrays of infrared detectors (such as ferroelectric detectors or microbolometers). Some critical military applications (such as spatial analysis of combustion processes in turbines combustors and afterburners) require the use of high spatial resolution infrared fiber bundle imagers (FBIs) due to the area of study being inaccessible to infrared cameras because of limited size and/or extreme environment. Coherent FBIs are commonly used in the visible and near infrared (0.4 to 1 microns) to remotely transfer images to cameras. Unfortunately, coherent FBIs for infrared imaging in the range of 1-12 microns are not commercially available. The work conducted during the SBIR Phase I demonstrated the feasibility of developing innovative FBIs that are inexpensive, flexible, rugged, high fiber-count bundles for use in the 1-12 microns. The FBI fabrication process will be perfected during Phase II effort to produce low-cost coherent infrared imaging fiber bundles that are 2-4 m in length, 1000-10,000 fibers in a 10 mm diameter bundle, minimum bend radius of 8 cm and attenuation less than 1 dB/m over the spectral range of 1 to 12 microns. BENEFIT: Fiber bundle imagers (FBIs) in the spectral range of 1-12 microns have many potential applications. The proposed FBI is targeted primarily at military applications for infrared viewing of harsh environment and/or in tight space where infrared camera cannot be used. The Air Force has a specific requirement for infrared viewing at turbine combustors and afterburners. The infrared FBI has other potential uses in military aircraft for surveillance, reconnaissance, and threat warning systems. Security Agencies (Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security) and law enforcement officials could use the infrared FBI as a thermal fiber endoscope for covert surveillance from a safe distance to support hostage rescue, building surveillance, clearance, and search operations. Also the FBI can be made small enough to apply infrared spectroscopy to the study of human and other tissues. In-vivo biomedical imaging could differentiate spectra of cancerous tissues from those of corresponding non-cancerous tissues.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

34 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2025). Reported award amounts total $14,872,663. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.