SBIR/STTR Research Award

Conformal, Light-Weight&Load-Bearing Antennas Based on Conductive Textile Threads

Award identifier 9e8e848cbf680533c752e677fc22722e2f23ff0218ed32432d8427db9a51c403Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,775

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
NEXTGEN AERONAUTICS, INC.
Proposal award date
2012-02-15
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ZKMCL2QBEN46
Solicitation number
2011.B
Topic code
AF11-BT13

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: NextGen Aeronautics Inc. proposes use of CNT yarn to weave antenna elements into composite fabric used on Unmanned Vehicles. Use of highly conductive materials, which have previously demonstrated performance at least as good as copper at the desired frequencies, woven into the structural materials will enable antennas to be more simply mounted on a UAV. This ease of integration will also reduce the required structural modifications, weight of the antenna system, and drag on the vehicle. Additionally, by using different mounting points the antenna performance can be improved. This will lead to fewer antennas or more capability for the vehicle. By using structural excitation technology, which team members have worked on previously, the antenna size can be quite small compared to the frequency, enabling lower frequency capabilities on small vehicles. The team will review multiple conductive materials to ensure that the one with optimal performance in the desired frequency band is used. The final material will be woven into a demonstration article and tested to validate performance simulations. BENEFIT: Currently small UAVs are not able to have low frequency antennas at the commonly used UHF and VHF frequencies do to the size of the antenna required to pick up the transmissions. By using structural excitation technology, the whole vehicle can be used as an exciter for the antenna, allowing the actual element and associated hardware to remain much smaller and lighter for these low frequencies. Enabling these vehicle to access the VHF and UHF frequencies will greatly improve their capabilities and usefulness to the warfighter on the front lines. In addition to providing improved performance for new vehicles, integrating conductive materials into existing composite structures will allow these structural excitation antennas to readily replace existing antennas or be added to a vehicles existing EM suite. Simply replacing some of the skin panels with ones incorporating the highly conductive material will allow any vehicle to use the structural excitation technology and effectively operate much larger antennas covering much lower frequencies than is possible now.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

128 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2026). Reported award amounts total $45,716,575. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.