SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Bandwidth Plasma Sensor Instrumentation for the Measurements of Turbine Inlet Conditions

Award identifier e4547843d255605629811f4f5aece5831b63f74c7c3d8d122fd9385b30206a7bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$499,828

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SPECTRAL ENERGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2011-08-24
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
C3DAVH4VJDG3
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-167

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Modern gas turbines must reduce emissions while demonstrating improved efficiency, durability, and performance. Designers are using higher compression ratios and peak temperatures to meet these goals. Flows in the area of the turbine inlet are highly unsteady, non-uniform, and 3-dimensional. The lack of information of inlet conditions in the turbine results in faulty distribution of cooling flows in the stage 1 nozzle leading to durability issues. These challenges make it difficult for turbine designers who need accurate estimates of inlet boundary conditions. Current measurement techniques can not provide the necessary time-resolved information. In Phase I, we demonstrated the feasibility of a new class of AC plasma sensor for high enthalpy flows. These sensors feature very high bandwidth (1MHz) and spatial resolution (1 mil) in a low-cost, simple, and rugged design. Using these designs, multiple sensors can be mounted on rakes to provide turbine inlet flow conditions over planar regions. During Phase I, measurements of pressure fluctuations in the exhaust of a gas-turbine were performed at 1600F and operation up to 3500F is possible with current materials. In Phase II, we will extend the operating capability of these sensors to 4500F using film-cooling techniques. The sensors developed under Phase II will be demonstrated in realistic engine environments and appropriate measurements such as temperature, pressure, and mass flow will be made. Significant efforts will also be made for tech transition and commercialization of the proposed sensors. BENEFIT: Research performed during the Phase II study will provide a suite of rugged sensors that are optimized to measure multiple parameters, such as temperature, pressure, and mass flow. These sensors will have all of the native advantages provided by the plasma approach including extremely high frequency response greater than a MHz, high sensitivity, excellent noise rejection, robust architecture to withstand high loads and temperatures, and a micro-miniature scale through MEMS packaging.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

272 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2026). Reported award amounts total $120,780,215. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.