SBIR/STTR Research Award

Intelligent Pairing Assistant (IPA): A Learning-based Framework for Assisting Capability-Need Pairing

Award identifier 5713ed97086b5ba0902bb49b6b74f5cac71ef239fa562a8d3e19245f5cf82080Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,915

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
STOTTLER HENKE ASSOCIATES, INC
Proposal award date
2011-07-28
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FFEAH6Z5CK27
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-026

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Within an Air Operations Center, planners working in the Master Air Attack Plan cell make crucial decisions to create the air plan for any given day. They are expected to complete the plan in part by pairing targeting or collection tasks with the available platforms and weapons. Any assistance these planners can get to help create the plan in a timely manner would make the entire process more efficient and effective. One major challenge is orchestrating the target list; designing packages to strike more than one target at a time makes efficient use of resources and improves survivability. Another challenge is making the best use of available resources. For instance, rather than assigning a un-tasked resource to a collection, it may be more expedient to instead assign an aircraft already slated to perform a strike near the target. This proposal outlines a system, the Intelligent Pairing Assistant (IPA), designed to help planners address both of these challenges. The Phase II proposal builds directly on the results of the Phase I investigation, focusing on providing a small number of easy-to-understand pairing recommendations at specific decision points to help planners perform their work more efficiently and effectively. BENEFIT: There are three commercialization paths for the Intelligent Pairing Assistant (IPA) that we will pursue in Phase II: as a MAAPTK plug-in, as an assistant for other AOC systems such as TBMCS, and as a general pairing assistant for other planning domains. The first two options are the primary commercialization paths, pursuing Phase III funding within the US Air Force to transform the system at the end of Phase II into a fully deployed framework for assisting pairing either with MAAPTK or another AOC system. A third commercialization path would be to take the underlying technology and repurpose it for use in Navy Maritime Operation Centers, Department of Homeland Security, or civilian planning systems, for tasks such as wildfire fighting, by encoding knowledge from, and integrating IPA with, the new domain.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

428 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2026). Reported award amounts total $136,164,855. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.