SBIR/STTR Research Award

Turbine Component Rapid Manufacturing via Electron Beam Melting/Electrochemical Machining

Award identifier 21b5ddd586ab1759469ddde41703fc28e3c0e7e538ad1ace4af7f8152dc53b96Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,366

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Barber-Nichols, LLC
Proposal award date
2011-06-17
Contract end date
2012-05-16
UEI
K4GJKMQD4961
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000413
Topic code
26 b

Research abstract

Development of new, more efficient gas turbine engines is a lengthy process of engine test iterations to maximize performance. This engine development cycle time is driven to a large extent by the manufacturing process used to produce the engine hot section turbine components. Barber-Nichols Inc. (BNI) proposes combining a newly developing rapid manufacturing process technology Electron Beam Melting (EBM) with Electro Chemical Machining (ECM) to reduce manufacturing cycle time and cost by replacing the existing investment casting and/or multi-axis machining methods used to produce turbine nozzles, blades and blisks. Successfully combining the near-net shape rapid manufacturing EBM process with the rapid removal rate afforded by the ECM process in relevant high temperature superalloys such as Inconel 625 or MAR-M-247 would enable manufacturing cycle time reductions of critical turbine components by a year or more and at a lower cost. During Phase I, BNI with support from Teledyne Brown Engineering, will demonstrate feasibility by rapidly manufacturing representative high-quality, dimensionally-accurate turbine blade geometries and internal cooling passages in both Inconel 625 and MAR-M-247 materials. Also during Phase I, verification of elevated temperature material tensile properties will give confidence that more extensive material tests in Phase II will enable usage of the EBM/ECM process for the rapid manufacture of turbine components to be tested at the end of Phase II in a representative gas turbine engine. Upon successful completion of Phase II, commercialization of the EBM/ECM process will begin to gain acceptance by gas turbine manufacturers with the utilization of EBM/ECM as a means to reduce development cycle time and cost of new, more efficient industrial gas turbine engines. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: The benefits of the EBM/ECM process will span across all industries including medical, aerospace and others that require casting of parts during development and/or require limited production. The process provides a low-cost, rapid manufacturing alternative to casting and machining of complex parts in a broad range of structural metals.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

27 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2020). Reported award amounts total $5,470,502. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.