SBIR/STTR Research Award

Poison Resistant Water-Gas-Shift Catalyst for Biomass and Coal Gasification

Award identifier dc2b20111aa98ee458f4fa67b143ad1e800b109f4845c55c4eb540ac545f2e70Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2011-08-15
Contract end date
2013-08-14
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000508
Topic code
26 b

Research abstract

Co-feeding biomass with coal in a gasification-based synthetic fuels plant has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions by 50% or more. Unfortunately, the catalysts currently used to convert the syngas from the coal-biomass gasifier are poisoned by compounds that originate in the biomass and coal. Thus, the development of poison-resistant catalysts will advance coal-biomass-to-liquids (CBTL) technology or carbon free integrated gasification combined cycle. The water gas shift (WGS) reaction that converts the CO in syngas to hydrogen is an important step in all synthetic fuels processes. Hydrogen sulfide (from coal or heavy hydrocarbons) poisons conventional WGS catalysts, thus sulfur tolerant WGS catalysts are widely used. Unfortunately, they must be run at higher temperatures than conventional WGS catalysts and consequently convert less CO to hydrogen (because of equilibrium limitations). TDA Research Inc. (TDA) has developed a new sour WGS catalyst that is as active as conventional low temperature water-gas-shift catalysts and which is not poisoned by sulfur and other contaminants present in syngas produced during the gasification of coal and biomass. Our catalyst converts more CO to hydrogen, improves the energy efficiency and economics of CBTL and integrated gasification combined cycles (IGCC plants). It can be used as a drop-in replacement for existing catalysts. In Phase II, we will optimize the catalyst formulation, scale up catalyst synthesis and perform extensive lifetime activity testing with a wide variety of contaminants present in syngas derived from the co-gasification of coal and biomass. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Sulfur-tolerant water gas shift catalysts are not only useful for converting coal and biomass to liquid fuels, but are routinely used in gasification or partial oxidation processes that run on coal, coke, bitumen and other heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks. Therefore in addition to synfuels production, they will also find applications in petroleum refineries, methanol and ammonia plants, and stationary power production.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.