SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Performance Catalytic Heat Exchanger for SOFC Systems

Award identifier 7bf7ad871ff496b0b5fa6025c98b975086f704ad40dff96205b2c5ead9316e70Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,958

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-06-17
Contract end date
2012-05-16
UEI
FSN3MKNGEDX8
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000413
Topic code
27 b

Research abstract

Efficient utilization of our nations fossil and renewable energy sources is a top priority to secure a sustainable energy future. Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) based power systems represent an emerging technology that have the potential to produce clean electric power at nearly twice the efficiency of small-scale combustion engines and to nearly eliminate the release of NOx and SOx to the environment. Recuperation of heat at high temperatures (up to 1000C) is a crucial component of an SOFC system. In a typical SOFC system, hot effluent gas from a catalytic combustor is piped to the source side of a high temperature recuperator, preheating fresh air for the cathode. To create a competitive market-entry SOFC product (300kW nominal rating), BOP costs must be reduced. The catalytic combustor and the cathode air preheater represent 25-40% of the BOP cost, and therefore represent the largest opportunity for cost reductions. FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCE), in partnership with Modine Manufacturing Company and BASF Catalysts, is proposing the development of a novel catalytic heat exchanger which combines the functionality of the separate catalytic combustor and cathode air preheater into a multi-functional single unit. Applying this innovative technology to SOFC power systems has the potential significantly reduce BOP costs while also meeting the severe technical design requirements. In addition to the high operating temperature and temperature differentials, the heat exchanger must also be designed to withstand a corrosive environment on the source-side (H2O, O2), thermal cycling, and impart very low pressure drop on both the source and sink sides. Low cost is also a key criterion for design of the cathode air preheater. The proposed research and testing program is anticipated to address critical design challenges through multidisciplinary design optimization and lab-scale component testing. It is anticipated that successful deployment of a catalytic heat exchanger will significantly reduce the cost for SOFC power systems and pave the way for entry to the distributed generation market within 5 years

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

51 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2020). Reported award amounts total $13,080,296. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.