SBIR/STTR Research Award

Industrial Flue Gas Cleanup using DFC Technology

Award identifier 885e39330c53f8c8a9a853266d95d6b6225f75ab8df4e9816fa07c046565fdddAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$79,936

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-03-01
Contract end date
2011-08-31
UEI
FSN3MKNGEDX8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
D

Research abstract

"The increasing atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxides has been linked to climate change, which has a myriad of environmental and human health implications. In response to this growing concern, FuelCell Energy (FCE) has developed novel system concepts for separation of Carbon dioxide from greenhouse gas (GHG) emission sources, using Direct FuelCell® (DFC®) technology. DFC is based on carbonate fuel cell technology. The unique chemistry of the carbonate fuel cell offers an innovative approach for approach for separation of CO2 from plant exhaust streams (flue gases). Preliminary test results also show that the DFC cut NOx emissions in half. The carbonate fuel cell system produces electric power at high efficiencies and the simultaneous generation of power and CO2 capture is an attractive concept for gas cleanup. Development of this system is concurrent with emergence of DFC technology for generating electric power from fossil fuels. This technology has been deployed I megawatt-scale power plants and is readily available as a manufactured product. The objectives of the Phase 1 activities are to determine the cost and power output for utilizing the DFC-based cleanup system on a variety of industrial source flue gas compositions including refinery operations, cement kilns and pulp and paper mills. The composition of the flue gas from the different industries is one aspect which determines the power output of the DFC system. The power output in turn determines the overall cost and therefore the economic feasibility of DFC-based carbon capture. A literature review will be conducted to formulate a database of industrial flue gas compositions and trace level contaminants. Bench-scale single cell tests will be used to generate fuel cell performance curves using simulated industrial flue gas. This data will feed into existing DFC carbon capture model to generate capital cost estimated for DFC-bases industrial flue gas clean up applications. Phase 2 efforts would involve defining flue gas cleanup boundaries and the effect of traces contaminant levels identified in Phase 1 literature search. Phase 3 would involve a commercial DFC unit demonstration at an industrial site. "

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

51 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2020). Reported award amounts total $13,080,296. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.