SBIR/STTR Research Award

SynCon: a Master-time Synchronized Event Controller

Award identifier 7c4d7fcf424ae63db86e28aa41a6fcca6d0f1cb72c395cc938efdf4b68c24b3eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$98,125

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Intelligent Automation, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-05-19
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
C3QJD7VXG167
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-236

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The Holloman High Speed Test Track (HHSTT) is the world's premier rocket sled test track. During tests, payload and instrumentation are moved over miles along rails by means of rocket sleds. Events like firing motors, initiating flares, and deploying petals are initiated along the length of the track when appropriate speeds/accelerations are reached. High speed sensors are used to collect data about the test events. Data and triggers must be time synchronized with sub-microsecond accuracy. However, the timing accuracy provided by the legacy master control computer is too poor for anticipated needs. Also, a solution independent of a cable plant leveraging modern wireless technology is desirable Intelligent Automation, Inc. proposes SynCon: a wireless, time-synchronized, event control system. SynCon consists of a single Master Event Controller and multiple sub-stations along the track. SynCon will use GPS-disciplined clocks at each sub-station along the track, and derive accurate timing data. We will also use redundant synchronization methods to improve robustness and performance. This reconfigurability will facilitate integration with legacy equipment (e.g. using serial/parallel interfaces), or newer instrumentation using USB or Firewire. BENEFIT: The proposed work directly addresses a critical need of the Air Force, specifically the need for cost-effective testing and evaluation of must-have equipment and safety features. wireless synchronization technology in general has both military and civilian applications. Military test ranges requiring common, precise time tagged event initiation and data collection. Large factories, refineries, docks or rail yards requiring common, precise time tagged events. Sync systems used in cell phone base-stations provide the source for the transmission frequencies that carry the data between cell-sites and the cell phone users, distribute UTC time, and synchronize all the stations in the network so the user's conversation is seamlessly transferred from one cell site to the next. The biggest users of these precision sync technologies are all the communications related industries, government/military services, and public utilities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,182 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2021). Reported award amounts total $369,972,257. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.