SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wireless Event Controller

Award identifier c4c97e0ce19c0147e628d9bc4587ff735b3f658bd302b3fe55214839f263edb2Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$97,650

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
2011-05-06
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-236

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: To address the Air Force"s need for a time-synchronized, event control system to replace its current rocket-sled control system. Physical Optics Corporation (POC) proposes to develop a Wireless Event Controller (WIRELESSEC). The system is based on a high-speed, precise, and long-range RF link and an intuitive user interface (GUI) that controls, monitors, and records events over a 12 mile area. The innovations in WIRELESSEC will enable the system to provide a wireless communication link with a universal system clock that includes hardware compensation of propagation time errors. The precise electronics will enable all events to be time tagged (at test initialization) with a precise time resolution (10 ns) directly addressing the Air Force"s requirement for maximum time resolution (100 ns or better). In addition, WIRELESSEC has a special operator-controlled abort/hold button that is fast and reliable, with a custom GUI allowing for rapid and intuitive customization of the test setup and the recorded data. In Phase I, POC will demonstrate the feasibility of WIRELESSEC with a scaled down (100 meter range) prototype and define a concept for implementation. In Phase II, POC plans to develop a full-scale prototype (12 mile range) of the system with several primary and backup events. BENEFIT: The ability to wirelessly control and record accurate (10 ns) time-tagged events over long distances (12 miles in this case) is a breakthrough application that will benefit the nation by enhancing this particular rocket sled application, as well as other military and commercial applications that require this amount of time accuracy and synchronization. To put the 10 ns time resolution into perspective, the radio signal requires 63.36 s to go the 12 miles from the base station to the end of the track. Some significant commercial applications include large factories, refineries, docks, rail yards, and vehicle crash testing facilities that require precise time-tagged events.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.