SBIR/STTR Research Award

The Characterization and Mitigation of Radiation Effects on Nano-technology Microelectronics

Award identifier 6a2b281848ff6c9019653f3a8ddaf38b0708e1b979091f3779dfbdf53bbcdaf5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Recipient company
Orora Design Technologies, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-04-19
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
2010.2
Topic code
DTRA102-008

Research abstract

OBJECTIVE: The successful outcome of this effort will support the use of ultra-deep submicron integrated circuits in DoD satellite systems that will result in very significant savings in weight, power and reliability for systems that include Space Radar, Space Tracking and Surveillance Systems and others. In addition, this effort will also support the use of compound semiconductor technologies (e.g. antimony based compound semiconductors, indium phosphide, and others) in these systems and their introduction into advanced spacecraft and missile systems with similar savings in both power and weight, coupled with increased performance. DESCRIPTION: Current satellite systems are fabricated using a mix of commercial and radiation hardened circuits. However, the use of advanced commercial integrated circuits devices results in added complexity to mitigate radiation effects that can result in the mis-operation and/or destruction of devices. In many cases, the penalties in increased power, area, weight and added circuit complexity out-weigh any potential benefits and preclude the use of the advanced commercial technology. Moreover, these technologies have demonstrated sensitivity to radiation effects. The present methods to mitigate radiation effects, while proven to be effective at circuit geometries>150nm silicon based technology, have been shown to be less effective when applied to integrated circuit feature sizes below 100nm silicon based and compound semiconductor technologies. In addition, the introduction of new technologies, e.g. quantum function circuits, will require the development of new mitigation approaches. Thus, if minimally invasive methods such as the use of alternative materials, circuit enhancements, and other innovative approaches could be developed to reduce radiation effects sensitivity these devices could be used with little or no penalties. Therefore, the basic approach to accomplish this task would be to leverage commercial microelectronics at the<90nm nodes and augment these technologies with radiation mitigation techniques that would have minimal impact on the electrical performance and manufacturability. This same approach also applies to the radiation hardening of the compound semiconductor and other technologies. Additionally, the development of such methods requires the development of cost effective methods to model and simulate the radiation response of these<90nm, compound semiconductor and other technologies. Without a robust modeling and simulation capability it would be both technically and economically unfeasible to develop these mitigation methods. PHASE I: Identification of minimally invasive methods, including material approaches, to mitigate radiation effects in<90nm microelectronics technologies, III-V, SiGe and other materials systems. Development of cost effective radiation effects modeling and simulation methods for<90nm microelectronics, compound semiconductor and other technologies for digital and analog/mixed-signal microelectronics applications. Identification of design science approaches to mitigate radiation effects. PHASE II: Electronic Design Automation tools (programs) that can: o Identify design sensitivities in complex integrated circuits o Design radiation insensitive integrated circuits o Perform trade studies to provide optimized integrated circuits with respect to radiation and electrical performance o Analyses the radiation response of complex integrated circuits Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) tools that can: o Provide cost effective 3-D models to support the simulation of the radiation response of nanotechnology microelectronics. o Identify radiation sensitivities at the transistor level Mixed-Mode and Level Simulation systems that can effectively couple the radiation response at the transistor level to higher levels of circuit and subsystem integration (e.g. transistor response to small circuit to complex circuit to sub-system) to support the accurate radiation response simulation up to and including the sub-system level. Radiation effects Product Design Kits (PDK) that combine the electrical and radiation response design and modeling parameters for a specific technology. PDKs are provided by semiconductor manufacturers to their customers to support design activities. In general a semiconductor manufacturer will develop an electrical performance and design PDK that must be then augmented with radiation performance to support customers that require the technology to be used in a radiation environment. Development and demonstration of<90nm radiation effects modeling and simulation methods for these technologies. Development and demonstration of design science approaches for radiation effects mitigation. PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Use of the mitigation, modeling and simulation methods developed through this effort will support the use of advanced microelectronics for terrestrial applications such as very high performance microprocessor, advanced servers, and very large cache memories. REFERENCES: 1. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science; December 2007, Volume 54, Number 6, Session H: Single Event Effects Mechanisms and Modeling, pages 2297 - 2425 2. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science; December 2005, Volume 52, Number 6, Session A Single Even Effects: Mechanisms and Modeling, pages 2104-2231 3. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science; December 2005, Volume 52, Number 6, Session F Single Even Effects: Devices and Integrated Circuits, pages 2421-2495 4. JEDEC 57, SEE Test and Characterization Guidelines and Test Method 5. Military Test Method 1019, Steady State Total Ionizing Dose 6. ASTM 1892 Steady State Total Ionizing Effects Guideline

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.