SBIR/STTR Research Award

New Sorbents to Contol CO2 and Multi-Contaminant Emissions

Award identifier 2e92cec629fc4e697ad532e06ce60e7632f963492e33e598dee35ea5a7a247c3Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$80,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2011-03-01
Contract end date
2011-08-31
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
D

Research abstract

"The oil refining industry is one of the most significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions, with considerable contribution from downstream activities. CO2 emissions from refineries rank third among the stationary producers (after power and cement industries), accounting for about 4% of the global CO2 emissions, approaching 1 billion tons per year. In addition, the oil refineries also emit significant amounts of heavy metals (such as mercury and arsenic), through stack emissions. CO2 emissions at refineries can be reduced through a number of routes, including carbon capture and storage via oxy-firing, pre-combustion and post combustion scrubbing, but these methods are expensive. None of the existing technologies reduce the emissions of volatile materials. TDA Research, Inc. (TDA) proposes to develop a low cost, high capacity CO2 adsorbent and demonstrate its technical and economic viability for post-combustion CO2 capture from petroleum refineries. In addition to CO2 the sorbent will remove volatile heavy metals (e.g., mercury and arsenic) from the flue gas. The object of this work is to develop a new chemically modified mesoporous carbon sorbent to simultaneously remove CO2 and other harmful contaminants (e.g., mercury and arsenic) from petroleum refineries. Anticipated Results Phase I In the Phase I project, we will synthesize different sorbent formulation and screen then based on their CO2 capacity and removal efficiency. We will show that the sorbent retains its activity for many adsorption/desorption cycles (a minimum of 1,000 cycle test will be carries out in Phase I) in the presence of flue gas contaminants simulating conditions downstream of a wet scrubber. We will also assess the performance of the sorbent for mercury and arsenic removal. We will carry out a preliminary design of the sorbent reactors used in the adsorption and regeneration steps and project their cost. We will estimate all consumables and parasitic power loss to support the operation of the CO2 capture system. Finally, we will estimate the technical and economic viability of the new multi-pollutant capture technology to retrofit the petroleum refineries. "

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.