SBIR/STTR Research Award

MAI-1/2U-ADACS (Attitude Determination and Control System) for CubeSats

Award identifier 12aa47c8a72abc91737f81d58da3e9e108c4ae0a621f8963a90a0e98f6d1b16bAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,591

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Maryland Aerospace, Inc.
Proposal award date
2011-02-23
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
WQ2HKAR812S9
Solicitation number
2010.3
Topic code
AF103-083

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The MAI-1/2U-ADACS for CubeSats is a smaller than 1/2 U size complete ADACS system composed of a 3-axis reaction wheel, a novel 0.1 & #61616;-0.2degrees Earth Horizon sensor employing earth limb image processing in two orthogonal cameras, a sun sensor, 3-axis magnetometer, 3 torque coils and an attitude control computer that can accommodate additional sensors (such as GPS). The entire MAI-1/2U-ADACS is contained in a volume of about 10cm x 10 cm x 4 cm. It has a large enough momentum capacity to slew a 3U CubeSat at 8degrees/sec. When used with CubeSats it converts them to a very stable platform on which very accurate experiments requiring precise attitude control can be mounted. During Phase I, a prototype 1/2U ADACS will be developed, tested and exercised in a HITL (Hardware-In-The-Loop) environment to demonstrate and verify the performance capabilities of the system. In addition, mechanical and electrical and software interface specifications will be written to permit a user to integrate the MAI-1/2U-ADACS into his 3U CubeSat with a minimum of effort and within a very short time. HITL software will also be provided so that a customer can retest the system at his own facility. BENEFIT: The MAI-1/2U-ADACS will provide the ever larger CubeSat community a robust, easy to integrate and very small ADACS of 0.1-0.2degrees attitude control capability. With this capability (and an affordable price) CubeSats will be able to realize the potential seen for them, as a low cost but very capable platform for space experimenters. Under a DARPA SBIR contract we developed the MAI-100 1U ADACS for CubeSats. The MAI-100 enabled a number of nanosatellite applications not previously possible. However, the MAI 1/2U ADACS will halve the volume, more than quadruple the attitude control accuracy and reduce the power consumption of the MAI-100, making it highly desirable as the ADACS of choice for the CubeSat community. The MAI-100 has been a marketing success, having sold in a year over 22 systems. Since that time the CubeSat community has exhibited substantial growth, now achieving about 50 satellites per year. We expect that our commercialization program will capture the lion"s share of this market, making this SBIR program pay off handsomely for the Air Force and for the commercial space community.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2017). Reported award amounts total $6,667,766. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.