SBIR/STTR Research Award

Incorporating High-Speed, Optimizing, Interleaving, Configurable/Composable Scheduling into NASA's EUROPA Planning Architecture

Award identifier 09c5782f0312d3be9bffb63cccd75ca2ba6098ee98c3bfea5129bfa4cf2447aaAwarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$99,938

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
STOTTLER HENKE ASSOCIATES, INC
Proposal award date
2011-02-18
Contract end date
2011-09-29
UEI
FFEAH6Z5CK27
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
X6.01

Research abstract

Advanced, robust, autonomous planning systems have not focused on the scheduling decisions made by the planner. And high quality, optimizing schedulers have rarely been integrated with such planning systems and only at a very coarse level. Little research regarding interleaving scheduling and planning has been done. Meanwhile, we have studied and implemented human scheduling decision processes over a 20 yr. period, developing the Aurora scheduling architecture in the process, which executes very rapidly and has solved scheduling problems in dozens of diverse critical domains. We propose to intimately integrate high speed, high quality scheduling algorithms from Aurora with NASA's existing EUROPA 2 architecture and expose high level descriptions of individual scheduling decision methods to end-users, enabling users to compose and configure these scheduling methods. A combined EUROPA-Aurora system would allow for more efficient plans and more optimal scheduling. It would allow EUROPA to better handle scheduling problems in its current domains and be better applied to domains with more significant scheduling issues. Better schedules will get more science done with the same time and resources.In Phase I, we will determine the requirements of the integrated EUROPA-Aurora system for the types of domains that would most benefit from the integration and will determine additional heuristics, algorithms, methods and techniques needed for Aurora for those domains. We will develop the Integration Design, including determining, with NASA's input, whether it is most beneficial to integrate Aurora with EUROPA directly or to port algorithms from Aurora to EUROPA. We will prove feasibility of the integration by implementing an integration prototype and applying it to two different domains to show its efficacy, generality, and adaptability. Two options that we are already familiar with are planning/scheduling for ISS operations and autonomous spacecraft/robots.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

428 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1990–2026). Reported award amounts total $136,164,855. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.