SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Electronic Canine Bite Performance Monitor

Award identifier 5944dd932214750bd5edddf3a11e528f8cf7430edb59d2432658394ebf35f576Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$249,899

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-08-27
Contract end date
2026-02-27
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
25.4
Topic code
A254-P001

Research abstract

Currently, nearly 2,200 working dogs are assigned to every branch of the U.S. military and are deployed worldwide. These specially trained MWDs are force multipliers, guarding military installations and detecting explosives. These highly trained working dogs receive extensive training and not every canine successfully achieves the desired standards, and some must be removed from the program. Each MWD, therefore, requires a significant time and monetary investment to train. The key functions of a MWD are its ability to detect, smell, warn and bite. Biting training aids such as a bite pillow, sleave or suit are commonly used during initial and continued training. Proper bite performance must be trained to ensure the MWD achieves a full-mouth bite with more pressure on the molar teeth and not the canines. The working dog must bite firmly, pushing into the target, maintaining bite pressure, grip, and stability. Currently used training aids require the trainer to feel the muscles on the canine’s head during bite to subtly assess the bite performance, however this process can be influenced by anatomical, biomechanical, and neurological factors. TDA Research, Inc. (TDA) proposes to develop an advanced electronic canine bite performance training aid to measure, and store important bite metrics during training. Biting is a key function of a MWD and by providing a technology that allows trainers and handlers to measure and characterize it, they will be able to evaluate and improve a canine’s bite performance. Measuring canine bite performance will have the operational impact of enabling data sharing between trainers, allow comparisons of training events, and allow bite evaluations throughout a working dog’s career which can then be used to track chronic conditions, detect new health or dental concerns, assess injury, recovery, and maximize training effectiveness. By enabling a trainer to quickly and easily determine the proper bite positioning, completeness, and evenness of the bite, the trainer can build confidence, validate their training effort, and receive a measurable indication of success, which can be very motivating. Ultimately, an advanced bite training aid that can measure bite performance will help ensure that working dogs are able to perform a key function safely with minimal chance of injury.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.