SBIR/STTR Research Award

Foam-Based Ignition System for Non-Toxic Propellants, Phase II

Award identifier 260e4e7ae329812196b02049b72213c23deb5b6eb26cb9a4a270344d92638f33Awarding agency Department of Defense

Award amount

$723,303

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
2010-09-30
Contract end date
2012-09-30
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
2008.1
Topic code
OSD08-PR2

Research abstract

Hydroxylammonium nitrate (HAN)-based monopropellants promise many improvements over monopropellant hydrazine and bipropellant nitrogen tetroxide/monomethyl hydrazine (NTO/MMH). But before HAN-based monopropellants can be commercialized, a reliable ignition system must be implemented. In this Phase II project Ultramet, working with American Pacific Corporation (AMPAC) In-Space Propulsion, will develop an ignition system for HAN-based monopropellants based on a monolithic open-cell foam catalyst bed that will be a non-sintering drop-in replacement for granular catalyst beds. As demonstrated in Phase I, several benefits are afforded by resistively heating the foam bed. Less electrical energy is used to heat the catalyst bed because the heat is generated within the bed, so surrounding hardware such as the combustion chamber is heated less. The ramp rate to operating temperature is very fast: less than 2 seconds to reach over 1100°C. The high preheat temperature realized by heating the foam directly enables reliable ignition with fast lightoff time. And, operating the resistance heater during propellant flow offers a performance advantage. In a 1- to 2-lbf class thruster, an additional 7 seconds of specific impulse is possible. In Phase II, laboratory testing will demonstrate the ability of the foam-based ignition system to transfer thermal energy to a stream of flowing propellant under a range of conditions, such as bed volume and flow rate at various power levels. The temperature and heat capacity of the liquid used for this laboratory simulation will be approximately that of AF-315e monopropellant in a satellite on orbit. After selecting the foam based on material type, pore size, and density, attention will be turned to designing the foam resistojet by incorporating electrode attachments and provisions for electrical feedthrough into the chamber. The iridium or platinum-iridium alloy wire electrodes will be attached to the foam by plasma spraying or chemical vapor deposition bonding with iridium metal. Electrical feedthrough will be accomplished by incorporating a thin spacer between AMPAC’s existing injector and combustion chamber through which the insulated current-carrying wires will run axially. The overall goal of the project will be to further develop the foam igniter and, working with AMPAC, test it in several ways. Initial hot-fire testing will be performed on a monolithic piece of foam coated with iridium. A conventional bed heater will be used (no resistojet function) and testing performed in standard fashion as if granular catalyst were being used. Subsequent testing will be performed in the form of an electrothermal thruster, in which current is applied to foam occupying the full bed length. The final test will be a hybrid approach using a thin disk of foam just downstream of the injector and the remainder of the bed filled with granular catalyst. The specific impulse increase afforded by the foam-based electrothermal thruster will be characterized. In all tests, the goal will be to demonstrate restart capability after one hour of testing time. The project seeks to advance the state of the art in AF-315e ignition and may be leveraged in Spiral 2 efforts under AMPAC’s Multi-Mode Propulsion System (MMPS) program.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.