SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of Multidisciplinary, Multi-Fidelity Analysis and Integration of Aerospace Vehicles

Award identifier 6a4eb4d91bc479af33e9ee4cbfe5421c51b4a12432b6f43357701deafc8823bbAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,972

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
VEXTEC Corporation
Proposal award date
2010-09-02
Contract end date
2012-08-31
UEI
K8DXK85LFYM4
Solicitation number
2008.B
Topic code
AF08-BT03

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Current aircraft design approaches incorporate the use of many high fidelity models for point solutions of individual disciplines. Sophisticated model integration techniques are not yet readily available and a significant amount of individual discipline “stovepiping” exists. Individual handoffs of point solutions between disciplines often results in repeated individual data interpretations. These interpretations often lead to erroneous decisions and/or add-in design conservatism. The technical goals of the Phase II effort will be to develop a multi-disciplinary computational framework that can decide efficiently where to use high fidelity models and where low fidelity models are sufficient. A demonstration will be conducted on an aircraft design model combining multiple levels of aerodynamic loading, stress analysis and structural reliability. This Phase II will be set up to show that models from acoustic fatigue, structure and material disciplines can be efficiently, computationally combined to address structural reliability of the panel. The objective will be to show that mathematic complexity can be harnessed with this STTR demonstration to optimize the system reliability of a stiffened multi-bay aircraft panel. The fully-probabilistic models assess the uncertainty in design characteristics to determine the statistical distribution of the response throughout the system. BENEFIT: Simulation-based design and certification is fundamentally about making decisions with uncertainty. The methodology developed under this Phase II program will yield a computational framework that will help the engineer by providing guidance on the following key issues: (1) How will changing the scale and fidelity of the analysis impact the uncertainty in the results? (2)What is the actual uncertainty in the simulation results? The structure of this framework will support the system engineering processes typically used by military and commercial aircraft OEMs. Successful completion of this Phase II STTR program will yield a computational framework closely aligned with realizing the long term Air Force vision of developing “digital twin” of the future hypersonic vehicles capable of global strike..

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

62 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2025). Reported award amounts total $30,120,250. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.