SBIR/STTR Research Award

Stochastic Characterization of Naval Aircraft Electromagnetic Vulnerability: ElectroMagnetic Susceptibility Threshold Analysis Techniques by Estimatio

Award identifier 240efabe37dccf07be03267be9a148a8456525183f692b930ff792907b0a73d4Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$499,962

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ANDRO COMPUTATIONAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Proposal award date
2010-05-10
Contract end date
2011-11-10
UEI
RJP8JJQGMKY4
Solicitation number
2008.A
Topic code
N08-T006

Research abstract

The objective of this research is to advance technologies for accurately and reliably characterizing the distributed fields within Naval aircraft and the associated currents on avionic systems and their interconnecting cables in the operational electromagnetic (EM) environment. This includes computing the fields and currents within aircraft cockpits, cabins and equipment bays at/near metallic walls and interior surfaces to predict electromagnetic interference/vulnerability (EMI/V) for installed electronic equipments. Detailed guidelines, embodied in a decision-based expert system tool called EMSTATES, will be developed to direct the generation and analysis of avionics system enclosure/cavity models to supplement existing computational electromagnetics (CEM) tools and EMI/C simulation methodologies. A systematic approach is employed for classifying cavity problems using a taxonomy of susceptibility matched against certain modeling regimes (deterministic, statistical, hybrid). Detailed criteria are developed to select a deterministic method versus a statistical method to efficiently obtain a solution to facilitate weapon system performance risk assessments. Statistical methods are well suited in cases where there is a large degree of uncertainty due to the complexity of both the physical structures (i.e., system-to-system variability, variations in equipment designs and installations), and the chaotic nature of the EM sources, which can render even mature CEM codes by themselves an inefficient means of addressing the problem. Deterministic methods using analytical or numerical tools may be suitable in certain other situations. The required fidelity of aircraft geometry models becomes an important consideration here. The EMSTATES guidelines to be developed in this effort are anticipated to provide highly useful insights into the selection of the appropriate analysis method and the amount of model detail that will be necessary to reduce model/analysis uncertainty by computing bounds on the confidence. This approach will help alleviate the complexity of the computational modeling process and lead to solutions optimized for computational efficiency. New techniques for hybridizing (bridging) the deterministic and statistical domains will also be developed. The guidelines will derive from reverberation chamber, anechoic chamber and mode-stir measurement insights with EM field sampling statistics applied to the current problem. Demonstrations to validate and refine the capability will be performed for both simple models and for a realistic Navy avionics equipment installation. Emphasis will be on source frequencies below 2 GHz, as well as problems through 17 GHz. The belief is that the vast majority of the EMI/V problems we face -- perhaps as much as 95% -- can be worked with simplified methods, best practices handbooks, and current or updated specifications. Therefore, the immediate task is two-fold: (i) find that "vast majority" of the problems and (ii) develop the "simplified methods" for them. The first will be achieved through the taxonomy, supported by additional measurements and computations. Finding those 95% of "simple problems" leaves only 5% to work in detail. This means that the adopters and users of the EMSTATES technologies can increase productivity by nearly 20X as a result.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

68 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2025). Reported award amounts total $39,379,837. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.