SBIR/STTR Research Award

Quantitative Back-Annotation of Simulink Models for Hardware Synthesis Optimization

Award identifier f7c07e21a063436e4c781643a606d999b1d7837526617c08bc8a5df1d6b6080eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
Dsplogic Inc
Proposal award date
2010-03-29
Contract end date
2010-09-30
UEI
R71SN7GNMT58
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
A09-131

Research abstract

Model Based Design and Implementation (MBDI) is an attractive alternative for FPGA development for several reasons: 1) Many Subject Matter Experts (SME) are already familiar with MBD environments for designing and validating algorithms, 2) the visual, data-flow oriented nature of MBD make it easy to describe highly parallel algorithms, 3) design automation eliminates traditional design, code, unit test and implementation phases, and 4) there is less risk of system design being “lost in translation” or errors being introduced in later design phases. The primary difficulties with MBDI are design optimization and validation. The SME must be able to optimize FPGA design tradeoffs, such as power, resource utilization and clock speed. Second, there must be a reliable method to validate bit- and cycle-accurate FPGA operation. Both of these tasks are made more difficult by the various stages of design representation, and hierarchical flattening that take place in the design flow. In order to optimize and validate the design, the SME must be able to clearly visualize and simulate the implemented design at all abstract representation levels, including the final implementation. This requires the output of the FPGA implementation tools to be back-annotated and linked to the Model in an intuitive way that is easy for the SME to understand. The primary goal of this project is to create a tool to solve this problem, allowing the optimized model developed by the SME to be the design for the final, fully validated implementation

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2018). Reported award amounts total $3,037,547. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.