SBIR/STTR Research Award

Responsive, Pre-launch and On-orbit, Electro-Optical Sensor Characterization and Calibration

Award identifier 4c526d83faa8fc11bde905bd2232d9091f252b6de848d3bfcd8111ed499ff8e8Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC
Proposal award date
2010-03-19
Contract end date
2011-03-18
UEI
P7SFAJZ6M9J6
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-090

Research abstract

The On-Orbit calibration process for space-based electro-optical (E-O) sensors historically has required durations much longer than the 24 hours typically needed to meet Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) mission requirements. We can dramatically shorten the on-orbit calibration timelines by developing models that incorporate per-pixel response compensation models with empirically derived coefficients to correct the sensor response over the span of likely operational conditions in which the sensor will be expected to perform. We will use ground test data to empirically develop these models and the coefficients used by them to correct the sensor response as a demonstration of this approach so that the warfighter would receive calibrated data with its expected uncertainty directly from the sensor or its proximate ground station. We will verify the practicality and the utility of these models with data that was not used in the generation of the model coefficients from a prototype instrument. We will identify modifications to the standard ground testing approach of measuring response at a few (usually two or three) temperature levels or other operational parameters that are within the ‘best’ operational regime so that we have the data to extend the useful operational envelope. BENEFIT: The results of this work will be directly applicable to any sensing program that has either quick reaction timelines or undergoes changes in the sensor operating conditions during operation that are large enough to cause deviations in the calibrated data that are larger than the system performance requirements for accuracy. This work will provide the methodology to generate response correction models, a methodology for constructing these models, and a proof-of-concept demonstration that this technique is valid using actual sensor data that has been collected during ground testing.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

158 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2022). Reported award amounts total $52,237,604. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Contractor profile

FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.