SBIR/STTR Research Award

SPA-S Cubesat Bus

Award identifier d027928c8a3f3682e81a11c1c12e621b381f209bcff81f0be939515966630747Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,946

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Pnp Innovations, Inc.
Proposal award date
2010-03-10
Contract end date
2010-11-12
UEI
GB8ZAQVL4J36
Solicitation number
2009.3
Topic code
AF093-088

Research abstract

New smallsat concepts are gaining acceptance as viable space systems capable of providing useful, cost effective scientific and military data. These small satellites (NanoSats) range from 4 kg Cubesats to 50 kg smallsats. NanoSats have the potential to be deployed to provide a relevant capability that is greater than expected from both a capabilities and cost perspective. This proposal offers to develop a novel Cubesat bus leveraging on-going programs in plug and play avionics that can support militarily useful payloads with capabilities ranging from a full 3-axis precision stabilized bus to simpler, cheaper active and passive busses. In Phase I we will lay the foundation with hardware and software prototype demonstrations leading to a full implementation in Phase II. BENEFIT: The SPA-compliant technologies, payloads, and supporting tools that we are developing, and propose to mature and extend in capability through this SBIR possibility, are largely tailored toward the space application domain. Within the space community, we feel that the scalability and extensibility characteristics of the standards allow all of the byproducts of development to traverse a broad spectrum of missions and classes. SPA was originally conceived in response to military space needs according to a responsive space mandate. The standard addresses “pinch-points” in the development process that hinder rapid design, prototyping, and assembly of the small satellite class. As such, tactical missions flown by the Air Force, ORS, and other DoD agencies stand to gain immensely from acceptance and application of this research. NASA of course also flies small satellites in an even broader context than the U.S. military. Planetary exploration missions provide an opportunity to challenge SPA in ways that the ISR and Comm roles presented to date have not. Of course many of NASA’s needs for the near future are excellent applications for SPA-based satellites; Technology demonstrator/qualification flights in a variety of Earth orbits, earth observing missions, and space weather gathering platforms are all examples of cases where ease of integration and testing could provide significant benefit. Universities and educational affiliates clearly stand to gain from these technologies – particularly in the area of reduced cost. If the push toward more readily available low-cost solutions to avionics is successful, education will be much more capable of conducting research and contributing to the pool of technology from which AFRL can utilize.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2014). Reported award amounts total $2,270,465. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.