SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Novel Eddy Current Brake Using Graded Conductivity and Wavenumber to Maximize Force

Award identifier c4130c3499d686618548662e4acb492eead06290ed0a21da5343fab5528376cfAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$589,944

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
AMERICAN MAGLEV TECHNOLOGY OF FLORIDA, INC.
Proposal award date
2008-09-11
Contract end date
2010-03-11
UEI
KJCCBBMK3LL9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
N07-T008

Research abstract

American Maglev Technology, Inc. (AMT) is pleased present this Phase II proposal of the Navy’s Advanced Eddy Current Braking Technology STTR to develop a replacement for the Navy’s high maintenance water brake. During Phase I, AMT and the University of Texas CEM proposed a unique, passive, reliable, efficient eddy current brake to accomplish the same result as the water brake and fit in the existing allocated water brake spaces. A unique combination of material composition and permanent magnet (PM) size and spacing allowed for the peak force per unit length to be effective during the entire shuttle deceleration. Both were linearly graded over the length of the eddy current conducting spear while the PM magnets remained stationary. The geometry of the Eddy Brake is coaxial; hence it is magnetically self centering, which ensures a clean translation during deceleration. Ultimately, this design led to a total required braking distance of 11 feet, which fell short of the goal of 9 feet, but was well within the threshold of 15 feet. During Phase II of the project, AMT will continue to grow and explore the Eddy Current Braking model with its mechanical engineering research team at the Georgia Institute of Technology, resulting in a proof-of-concept model and manufacture-ready drawings for a prototype brake. Further optimization will be performed on the model to taper the spear in order to decrease the total stopping distance and move closer to the goal of 9 feet. A detailed system dynamics model will also be produced. This model will successfully demonstrate the shock effects of braking on the eddy brake as well as the effects of braking on the ship. This model will also be used to demonstrate the thermal environment of the brake during the launch and recoil strokes, as well as assess the overall reliability of the braking system over multiple launches that are, and are not, within the given maximum end speed scenarios. AMT will also seek to use this phase to grow and diversify its team. AMT plans to conduct a peer review of its model using experts in the field, including CSA Engineering in Mountain View, Calif., in order to verify scientific principles and conduct a further detailed business case analysis for the eddy current brake.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2025). Reported award amounts total $9,347,253. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.