SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of State-of Charge Technology for Zn/Air Battery Systems

Award identifier d548b08863ba3b3c13983c661b0a8f06a1042fb4c930ffe53a6071087ffb200fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$747,295

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY CONNECTION, INC.
Proposal award date
2008-05-23
Contract end date
2010-05-23
UEI
KF6KL5THQZ44
Solicitation number
2006.2
Topic code
N06-101

Research abstract

The objective of this program is to develop and demonstrate a state-of-charge (SOC) technology for Zinc-Air batteries that accounts for environmental factors (temperature, humidity) and storage factors (O2 exposure times) beyond the discharge profile. The SOC technology should be small and have a low cost impact on the overall Zinc-Air battery. Power consumption for the SOC technology should be minimal over the life of the Zinc-Air battery. In Phase I, a general SOC architecture and its deployment to characterize Zinc-Air battery SOC with respect to discharge rate and environmental factors was developed. The major components of the architecture were (1) Coulomb counter, (2) microcontroller with RAM/ROM, (3) sensors to detect (one or more) of environmental factors, (4) analog preprocessing module and (5) a LED fuel gauge to visually indicate of SOC. The following key factors were determined to influence the accuracy of a SOC system for Zinc-Air when not taken into account: (1) temperature and humidity; and (2) O2 exposure times, shelf life and storage time. A Fuzzy Neural Network (FNN) enabled SOC algorithm was developed based on existing Zinc-Air constant discharge current performance data augmented by additional test data. The feasibility for developing and deploying a SOC indicator system for Zinc-Air batteries has been established. The primary goal of the proposed Phase II program is to develop and integrate prototype SOC indication technology for BA-8180/U (3rd generation) Zinc-Air batteries that accurately accounts for environmental and storage factors. This includes the development and conducting of a test plan that will train the SOC indicator and evaluate its accuracy with BA-8180/U & BA-8140/U (4th generation) Zinc-Air batteries at various states of charge and under various environmental and storage conditions. Finalize the selection of appropriate sensors (w.r.t. cost, size, power consumption), build and demonstrate one lot of prototype devices suitable for advanced laboratory and supervised field-testing. Aggressive commercialization and technology transition plans (Phase III) will be pursued teaming with our industrial partners.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

66 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2024). Reported award amounts total $20,669,422. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.