SBIR/STTR Research Award

Lightweight Foam-Based Vehicular Armor for Mine Blast Protection

Award identifier 1621dab5500f0a528b958407ef87cc129a40c581bfb8f3e742b135ba04813bd9Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
2008-02-14
Contract end date
2008-08-14
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
2007.2
Topic code
A07-178

Research abstract

Open-cell foams offer several unique mechanisms that can be used to defeat the threat posed by mine blast effects. The initial shock wave reaching the armor is by far the greatest threat, and dissipating the energy of this shock wave is the goal of the proposed work. The first mechanism relies on the cellular structure of the open-cell foam itself. Because the foam is essentially a two-phase system, and each phase has a different sonic velocity, the incident shock wave will be diffused by the foam structure. This will decrease the amount of blast energy under the curve and the peak energy delivery rate. By using a high-strength, ductile metal foam, a material far stronger than the aluminum foams tested in the past, additional blast energy will be absorbed via crushing. Furthermore, by filling the voids of the foam with an endothermic, energy-absorbing material, even greater energy-absorbing capability is added to the system. If the endothermic polymeric filler is chosen such that it behaves like a high-viscosity fluid at high shear rates, the overpressure from the blast wave will cause it to flow through the foam, and viscous dissipation will remove additional energy from the blast. Finally, by incorporating nanoparticles into the filler, additional energy can be extracted from the shock via viscous dissipation from the particles moving through the filler. Grading the mechanical properties of the system will further attenuate the blast wave and mitigate reflections and inadvertent amplification of the blast. The net effect will be a significant reduction in the level of energy transmitted to the underlying structure, and that energy will be transmitted at a slower, more sustainable level. By combining all of these mechanisms into a single lightweight system, ground vehicles will enjoy increased survivability and mobility because of the decreased armor weight. With a 1" thick slab of foam and lightweight filler, the areal density will be less than that of a 0.17" thick sheet of steel. The proposed system also offers the potential to incorporate traditional ballistic/fragment protection approaches by using a ceramic or a ceramic/metal laminate as one of the facesheets covering the foam.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.