SBIR/STTR Research Award

New Energetic Solid Propellant Ingredients

Award identifier 5fdc78d5ec72a77fb8245520562cb503e1638e946ba2f9cb120cc851332bb853Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,991

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
MACH I Inc.
Proposal award date
2006-09-22
Contract end date
2008-09-22
UEI
E4XRRLCUQGB5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
OSD05-T001

Research abstract

Boron has significant potential as a high energy density fuel in munitions and propellants. Its superior energy density makes it attractive as a fuel component in conventional solid propellants, as well as fuel slurries for ramjet applications. For a ramjet ducted rocket, theoretical density impulses of 1600-1800 sec-g/cm3 have been reported, 45% higher than the best hydrocarbon formulation. Boron’s potential has not been realized because it is difficult to ignite and resists complete combustion. Our Phase I project demonstrated that boron ignition and combustion were dramatically improved by magnesium coating to form MgB composites. Magnesium ignites at a lower temperature and facilitates boron ignition by heating the boron particle to its ignition temperature. Ignition temperature improved from 1800 to 1000K as determined by our Phase I partner, Dr. Edward Dreizin of the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Under the same conditions, pure boron did not ignite at all. Magnesium also promotes sustained combustion of boron by removing boron oxide, which inhibits combustion, as it is formed. Another advantage of MgB is the dramatic reduction of viscosity, compared with pure boron, when used to form mixes with hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene, thus permitting the use of higher levels of boron in fuel mixes. MgB composites were provided to Mark Mason and Mark Swett of NAVAIR Weapons Division, China Lake, CA, and to Talley Defense Systems (TDS). Mr. Swett found composite performance in enhanced blast munitions was superior to competitive materials. The results were positive to the point of considering whether the data should be secured in an interim secrecy order. This determination is in progress. More information can be provided by Mr. Swett subject to security considerations. Dr. Mason has confirmed these enhanced blast observations and has observed “a profound affect on the ballistic properties of solid rocket propellants” as well as improved ignition and combustion. TDS also confirms this in enhanced blast testing, finding increased thermal output for MgB compared to pure boron. Swett, Mason, and Talley all evaluated 10 atom % MgB. Phase I results show higher Mg levels significantly improve combustion vs.10% and should be evaluated in the proposed Phase II program to achieve boron’s potential in enhanced blast munitions and propellants.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2016). Reported award amounts total $6,271,599. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.