SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Comprehensive Health and Usage Monitoring System (HUMS) for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Award identifier e0e283d008c554084b4add14780f1c5cd6167f2ab8742ce0dedd3ed60222e20fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$729,350

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
Impact Technologies
Proposal award date
2006-04-08
Contract end date
2009-03-15
UEI
T1JNUWJLN5M1
Solicitation number
03.2
Topic code
A03-074

Research abstract

Impact Technologies, in collaboration Northrop Grumman and Lord Corporation, propose to develop a comprehensive health and usage monitoring system (HUMS) for direct application on the Fire Scout UAV selected as the Class IV UAV for the Army’s FCS. After several meetings between Impact, Boeing and Northrop Grumman, the Fire Scout UAV has been identified as the Army platform with the greatest need for prognostic and health management (PHM) capabilities and will replace the currently limited RTB (rotor track and balance) system. Specifically addressing this need by NG and Boeing, the Impact team will re-design and deploy an innovative 3-lb HUMS unit and fully demonstrate the capabilities on a scheduled Fire Scout flight test with Northrop Grumman. This will include embedding real-time HUMS algorithms for anomaly detection, fault classification and prediction into a newly designed COTS, aerospace-certified digital signal processing (DSP) based platform. Based on an analysis of the common and critical UAV subsystems, vital parameters related to UAV performance and mechanical health will be monitored to address condition-based maintenance activities that are required to ensure UAV mission success. Key UAV mechanical systems including the engine and drive train, along with a core RTB capability, will act as the core of the HUMS-UAV system development for this next phase of the program. A strong endorsement letter from NG is attached that highlights the need for this program in order to deliver the required Army PHM capability to the Fire Scout. The proposed COTS-based HUMS system is expected to improve UAV mission success rates and positively impact total ownership costs. The proposed Phase II development program includes the innovative 3-pound hardware design specifically addressing the needs of the Northrop Grumman Fire Scout UAV, but will be designed to be configurable to other UAV platforms. This work will leverage Impact's existing expertise in integrated HUMS and vehicle prognostic health management (IVHM) systems, Lord’s expertise in flight-qualified electronics hardware and Northrop Grumman’s vehicle design expertise.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

232 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2014). Reported award amounts total $76,299,884. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.