SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Affordable Health and Usage Monitoring System (HUMS) for UAVs

Award identifier 23cff5d0377fa43e0ea3873a8f4ee4248855a311dc9ffa3514f8fb06a9418f6fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,932

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Impact Technologies
Proposal award date
2005-07-18
Contract end date
2007-11-18
UEI
T1JNUWJLN5M1
Solicitation number
2003.1
Topic code
A03-074

Research abstract

Impact Technologies, in collaboration with The Boeing Company and Lord Corporation, propose to develop an affordable and lightweight health and usage monitoring system (HUMS) for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Based upon the requirements for UAV health monitoring investigated in Phase I, the Impact/Lord/Boeing team will re-design and mature the hardware/software concept, fabricate a prototype 3-lb unit, and fully demonstrate the capabilities by conducting realistic subsystem testing associate with a UAV such as the X-45 at Boeing. This will include embedding real-time health management algorithms for anomaly detection, fault classification and prediction into a newly designed COTS, aerospace-certified digital signal processing (DSP) based platform. Based on an analysis of the common and critical UAV subsystems, vital parameters related to UAV performance and mechanical health will be monitored to address condition-based maintenance activities that are required to ensure UAV mission success. Key UAV subsystems including the propulsion system, structures, actuators (fight control) and avionics that were the focus of Phase I will act as the core of the HUMS-UAV system development for this next Phase of the program. The Phase II prototype HUMS system will be designed to track the health of the UAV subsystems on-board using anomaly detection and diagnostic reasoning software that will also be capable of communicating the health status of the vehicle through a specified data transfer mechanism. The software will implement proven signal processing and automatic signal feature extraction techniques that are capable of identifying abnormal system behavior and reporting it to the diagnostic reasoning software. The development and integration of the advanced diagnostic and prognostic algorithms into a real-time health monitoring system is expected to improve UAV mission success rates and positively impact total ownership costs. The proposed Phase II development program includes a newly designed 3-pound hardware design that addresses the needs of unmanned programs such as J-UCAS. This work will leverage Impact's existing expertise in integrated vehicle prognostic health management (IVHM) systems, Lord’s expertise in flight-qualified electronics hardware and Boeing’s vehicle integration and design expertise.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

232 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2014). Reported award amounts total $76,299,884. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.