SBIR/STTR Research Award

Silicon CMOS Compatible, Ultra-compact, Power-efficient Nanophotonic Waveguide Modulator

Award identifier 012f71dbbec3f18814b0d52ac48dc4850f9c53007bbc430c83def97d5be4033cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$748,957

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
OMEGA OPTICS, INC.
Proposal award date
2005-09-15
Contract end date
2007-09-15
UEI
U11BUN3J3E88
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
AF04-T013

Research abstract

Nanophotonics promises to have a revolutionary impact on the landscape of photonics technology. Due to the maturity of sub-micron silicon CMOS technology, nanophotonics on silicon is anticipated to play a critical role in future nano-system integration. In this program, Omega Optics and the University of Texas at Austin propose an innovative approach to building ultra-compact silicon Mach-Zehnder(MZ) modulators. The proposed structure consists of carefully designed photonic crystal waveguides(PCW) in conjunction with a variety of electrode configurations, which exploit the plasma dispersion effect to achieve high-speed modulation. Incorporating the PCW nanostructure provides an unprecedented opportunity to enhance the modulation efficiency of silicon based MZ modulators, and a reduction of electrode length up to 100 times is expected. The ultra-short electrode length associated with the highly dispersive PCW nanostructure brings such exclusive advantages as low power consumption, high bandwidth, and potential for high-density integration of modulator arrays, which promises to outperform existing silicon guided-wave devices by at least one order of magnitude. More than 10 times device dimension shrinkage and power reduction have been demonstrated in Phase I. In the Phase II program, we will conduct in-depth investigation of the device physics through 3D time-dependent simulations and characterization of fabricated devices. The outcome of such study will assist us to enhance the modulation speed, lower optical loss, and further shrink the device and reduce power consumption. Device engineering and packaging issues will also be addressed to facilitate the demonstration of a fully packaged ultra-compact PCW Mach-Zehnder modulator array. Other photonic crystal based guided wave components will also be investigated for nanophotonic system integration. Application of ultra-compact, power-efficient photonic crystal nano-systems for Air Force use will be explored with emphasis placed on technology integration with our existing capability in phased array antenna research.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

83 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2024). Reported award amounts total $23,209,205. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.