SBIR/STTR Research Award

Distributed Event Streaming Platform

Award identifier 37893029392e8e2a1c6aef9e39248cc293191ea778543f5cfc646f8a004591f4Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$139,418

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
TRUSTEDQA, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-07-22
Contract end date
2026-01-18
UEI
PDKYLQGRXG68
Solicitation number
25.1
Topic code
N251-046

Research abstract

TrustedQA, Inc. proposes to research and develop an innovative Distributed Event Streaming Platform (DESP) to revolutionize the monitoring of tactical data link messages and synchronization of track data within the AEGIS Weapon System. This Phase I effort will leverage cutting-edge open-source distributed event streaming frameworks, such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, and Apache Storm, to achieve real-time synchronization of Track Numbers, Track Identification/Classification, and Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) modes and codes. The DESP introduces a decoupled producer-consumer architecture, enabling seamless scalability limited only by AEGIS infrastructure while ensuring robust fault tolerance, linear scalability, interoperability, and adaptability.The DESP will consist of two primary components: the DESP Cluster and endpoint simulations representing key systems like Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), Link 16, System Track Manager/Track Server (STM/TS), and Joint Track Manager (JTM). These open-source solutions are already in use within the DoD, mitigating security concerns and expanding the available talent pool for future transitions beyond Phase I. TrustedQA will focus on extensive integration, customization, and deployment configurations tailored to Navy-specific requirements, ensuring data synchronization accuracy and real-time availability across weapon systems.Key Phase I technical objectives include:Seamless interaction with JTM and other AEGIS systems.Real-time monitoring of all tactical data link (TDL) message types, including Link 16 and CEC.Ensuring interoperability across multiple producers and consumers within the AEGIS Weapon System.Developing automated data correction mechanisms to maintain data integrity.Demonstrating consistent, reliable data reception, processing, and synchronization without data loss.Implementing real-time data comparison algorithms for synchronized track attributes.Ensuring minimal resource impact, operating DESP in the background with less than 10% system resource usage.Synchronizing all critical track attributes, including Track Numbers, Identification/Classification, and IFF modes and codes.Exceeding ACS performance benchmarks by 10% or more in data throughput, correction speeds, and reduced message latency.Demonstrating robust fault tolerance and failover mechanisms to ensure zero data loss.The DESP will operate in parallel with existing data transmission methods, functioning as a secondary mechanism to ensure data integrity and synchronization. This architecture allows consumers to pull data from the DESP Cluster, compare it with their Track Stores, and correct discrepancies as needed. Acknowledgment messages and data pointers will guarantee reliable data transmission and reception, ensuring consistent synchronization.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.