SBIR/STTR Research Award

Portable Programmable Load Bank

Award identifier 39d56736e934f62e49d9a4a094ad271254be5ede409c5e9340fa63abbeffbb58Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,649

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TCS DESIGN & MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
JDZKLJH7LCE5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

TCS will design a Genset Test Set that will test, monitor, and fault diagnose existing and future flight line generators, and that will assist the U.S. Air Force in developing new advanced power gensets. The test set will be designed with openarchitecture, and with the versatility to test a wide variety of power sources. This will assist the Air Force in reducing the logistical footprint of its flight line support equipment.TCS will generate and deliver a Technical Requirements Document (TRD) specifying the customer requirements for the functionality, operability, electrical interface, portability, size, and weight of the test set; a technical data package (TDP), documentingthe test set design; and Budgetary Cost Information (BCI), including a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), detailing the level of effort and cost associated with the development of a prototype unit.The test set will consist of a commercial programmable load bank and an Electrical Signature Analysis (ESA) system, provided by our subcontractor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), packaged as a portable trailer. This approach of integrating existingtechnology will greatly reduce the program technical risk, and will allow resources to be allocated toward a more thorough design package. A variety of diesel-powered gensets to power aircraft, and to provide auxiliary flight line power currently are being used by both the military and airlines. In the interest of reducing emissions, fuel consumption, and flight line logistical footprints,both are conducting Research and Development (R&D) on advanced power solutions that could replace their existing flight line generators. Further, the U.S. Air Force has been expanding its flight line generators due to new aircraft requirements. TheGenset Test Set design being proposed by TCS would provide the Air Force with a single component that will test, maintain, and fault diagnose their existing and future flight-line generators, and that will assist in the development of new advanced powergensets. Using open architecture, the test set will be designed so that it can be easily modified to support new equipment as it is developed by the Air Force, or to support a variety of genset fleets. By providing one piece of equipment to support awide variety of gensets, and by designing the equipment to be easily upgradeable, the Genset Test Set being proposed by TCS will be marketable to both the military and the civilian industry.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2004). Reported award amounts total $1,049,127. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.