SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid Detection of Catheter Related Bacteraemia

Award identifier 79040eae67c55c7046c277c2a9c11fb3e4eeada3c98fb3ddb07baf0cc8ddb60aAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$151,662

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CELLEX, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ULF1BC9KMLS3
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Central venous catheterization is an essential part of intensive care and cancer patient care. Approximately 5 million central venous catheters are used each year in the U.S., and the number is expected to rise due to aging population. However, the major risk of using central venous catheters is that it can cause bacteraemia. Of the patients with central venous catheters, 3-7% (150,000 to 350,000 cases yearly) develop bacteraemia, of which 10-20% (15,000 to 70,000 cases) are fatal. In addition to high mortality rate, each severe bacteraemia case incurs $28,000 to 40,000 direct hospitalization cost. To reduce the incidence of bacteraemia, central venous catheters are often removed once a clinical symptom (e.g., fever) consistent with bacteraemia appears. Because clinical criteria such as fever are not reliable indicators for catheter related bacteraemia only a small fraction (15%) of the removed catheters are proven to be the source of infection or clinical symptoms. The unnecessary removal of catheter introduces additional risk and cost as a result of catheter reinsertion and antibiotic treatment. A rapid and accurate bacterial test such as the one postulated here would be a useful tool for aiding physicians in making accurate decisions on catheter removal. We propose to use our microparticle based amplification (MBA) technology and a novel class of bacterial markers to develop a bacterial test for such intended use. The MBA technology, when employed together with the novel class of bacterial markers, should permit the development of a test that is simple, inexpensive and yet highly sensitive. In this Phase I study, we will verify the feasibility of the MBA technology for use in detecting catheter related bacteraemia by (1) designing and formulating an assay, (2) optimizing the assay protocol, and (3) evaluating the assay performance in terms of its speed, specificity, sensitivity and quantitative capability. A successful outcome of this Phase I study and subsequent Phase II study will lead to commercialization of the test, which will contribute to the improvement of prospective diagnosis of catheter related bacteraemia and consequently the well being of patients.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2016). Reported award amounts total $4,942,808. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.