SBIR/STTR Research Award

Additive Manufacturing of High-Index Photonic Circuits

Award identifier 6de7ebdcbd0f3003694eb175054a5d60170086d956de8b747631f7c730b76eb7Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,995

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
NANOHMICS INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
K39ENMXNLA73
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
AF141-173

Research abstract

"ABSTRACT: Modern electronic and opto-electronic devices are predicated on controlled deposition and patterning of functional material layers (e.g. semiconductors, conductors, and dielectrics). A handful of techniques, including vacuum epitaxy and chemical vapor deposition, in conjunction with lithographic micromachining methods, have long dominated the manufacture of these systems, particularly as feature critical dimensions are driven further into the nanoscale. While these techniques are well-established and routinely deliver reliable and excellent performance, they are expensive to operate and maintain and are relegated to the processing of rigid, planar substrates. A host of new integrated optics and photonics technologies stand to benefit from transitioning the successes of vacuum thin film deposition and lithographic patterning to a mass-producible, conformable optoelectronic device manufacturing platform. Critical to this transformation will be the ability to use low-cost conventional printing technologies to pattern precursors of active-layer materials (e.g. semiconductors with high refractive indices) onto a variety of substrates and subsequently “consolidate” the precursors into photonic circuit components (waveguides, splitters, modulators, amplifiers, filters) and electro-optical devices (energy harvesting devices, conformal antennas, and infrared emitter and sensor arrays, for example). In some applications, a small performance tradeoff may be acceptable for a significant cost savings, but the patterned and consolidated end product performance ultimately must be comparable to its high-cost, traditionally-manufactured counterpart. To enable high-throughput, low-cost manufacturing of photonic circuitry, Nanohmics, Inc., an electro-optics and early-stage-technology development company based in Austin, TX, working in collaboration with industrial and academic partners have formulated a class of high-refractive-index-material inks and developed methods for in-line, direct-write printing and consolidation of the inks into photonic circuit components on large-area, continuous webs."

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

306 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $109,302,435. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.