SBIR/STTR Research Award

ENHANCEMENT TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBING EDDY CURRENT INSPECTION BY APPLICATION OF THERMALLY INDUCED STRESSES

Award identifier e98a91de3f4263888152b40ebc563a9a5203d4a5d4190d498bd6c887fba5be16Awarding agency Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Award amount

$49,819

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1992

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
FOSTER-MILLER, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
XDF1FRDG8KK4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

STEAM GENERATOR TUBES REPRESENT A UNIQUE PART OF THE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS). LEAKAGE FROM ANY OTHER PART OF THE RCS IS CAPTURED BY THE CONTAINMENT BUILDING, BUT STEAM GENERATOR TUBE LEAKAGE IS TRANSPORTED OUT OF THE CONTAINMENT BUILDING ALONG WITH THE STEAM, WHICH IS NORMALLY UNCONTAMINATED. STEAM GENERATOR TUBES, CONSEQUENTLY, DESERVE, AND RECEIVE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. THE ASSURANCE OF STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INTEGRITY IS THE GOAL OF THE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM. THIS PROGRAM PROVIDES FOR PERIODIC TUBE EXAMINATIONS WHICH ARE TYPICALLY PERFORMED BY EDDY CURRENT TESTING (ECT). ALTHOUGH ECT HAS PROVEN TO BE VERY GOOD AT DETECTING AND QUANTIFYING GENERAL WASTAGE, SOME FORMS OF TUBE DAMAGE ARE BEYOND THE CAPABILITY OF THE STATE-OF-THE-ART OF ECT. THE RECENT EXPERIENCE OF PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC AT THE TROJAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF THIS. TUBING SAMPLES REMOVED FROM THE TROJAN STEAM GENERATORS WERE INSPECTED USING THE MOST UP-TO-DATE ECT EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES AVAILABLE. THIS TESTING DETECTED NO DEGRADATION OF THE TUBE WALLS IN THE SUPPORT PLATE INTERSECTIONS. WHEN THE TUBE SAMPLES WERE SUBJECTED TO METALLURGICAL EXAMINATION, HOWEVER, THEY WERE FOUND TO CONTAIN TIGHT, AXIAL CRACKS, WHICH PENETRATED AS MUCH AS 70% THROUGH WALL. SUBSEQUENT BURST TESTING VERIFIED THAT THE TUBING HAD MAINTAINED ADEQUATE STRENGTH DESPITE THE CRACKS, BUT THE FAILURE TO DETECT THEM BY ECT MUST BE ADDRESSED. THE POTENTIAL EXISTS TO SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVE THE DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION CAPABILITY OF EXISTING ECT BY PERFORMING THE INSPECTION IN THE PRESENCE OF A THERMALLY INDUCED TENSILE STRESS. THE TENSILE STRESS WOULD SERVE TO OPEN THE TIGHT CRACKS SUFFICIENTLY TO PERMIT THEIR DETECTION BY ECT. THE SUBSYSTEM FOR INDUCING THE THERMAL STRESS WOULD PROBABLY REQUIRE INTEGRATION WITH THE ECT SUBSYSTEM TO SATISFY TIME REQUIREMENTS.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

924 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2006). Reported award amounts total $172,256,128. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.