SBIR/STTR Research Award

Continuous Oxygen Monitor for Patients on Long-Term Oxygen Therapy (COMPLY)

Award identifier e658552f81e66f24af638227e17cbcb68509f1e4f676d4bbb844313d1ad384ddAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$198,426

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
C8FUKQKC9JB4
Solicitation number
PA10-050
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is responsible for more than 500,000 hospitalizations and over 100,000 deaths in the United States annually. COPD is currently the fourth leading cause of death; it is projected to become the third leading cause of death in the U.S. by 2020 and worldwide by 2030. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), which is administered to patients via a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen source, such as an oxygen concentrator or compressed-gasor liquid oxygen cylinder is the only treatment that has been shown to improve survival in severe hypoxemia due to cardiopulmonary diseases; the improvement in mortality is greatest when oxygen is prescribed 24/7. LTOT is also associated with significant reductions in hospitalizations and lengths of stay, and improved quality of life. The benefits of adherence to LTOT are substantial both to COPD patients (in terms of morbidity and mortality) and to society (in terms of healthcare cost savings). Cliniciansand researchers currently assess adherence to LTOT over a given period by calculating the average daily use as determined via one of the following methods: (1) recording the hour-meter readings of oxygen con- centrators; (2) counting usage of oxygen cylinders; or (3) weighing liquid oxygen reservoirs. The concentrator's hour-meter reading provides only equipment power-on time over a given period. The number of cylinders used, or the change in weight of cylinder liquid oxygen reservoirs, reveals only theamount of oxygen expended. All of these measures of patient adherence fail to discern if the patient is actually wearing the nasal cannula or inhaling oxygen, as opposed to merely having the oxygen source turned on. Furthermore, current measures fail to provide information regarding the pattern of oxygen use within each 24-hour interval. There is currently no reliable means available in clinical practice or in research settings for assessing LTOT adherence. Nor is there a reliable means to monitor oxygen adherence for cost containment. Studies based on available methods for assessing adherence to LTOT indicate that many patients do not follow their physician's prescribed treatment regimen, resulting in inadequate therapy and wasted reimbursement dollars. For physicians to be able to communicate with their patients on a regular basis regarding their LTOT treatment and the importance of adherence to their health, it is essential to have accurate and objective measures of patients' adherence. The proposed PhaseI project will establish a Continuous Oxygen Monitor for Patients on Long-term oxygen therapy (COMPLY) functional prototype that objectively determines the duration and pattern of adherence with oxygen therapy on a minute-by-minute basis. With the development and demonstration in Phase I of a reliable monitor that can measure patient adherence 24/7, the Phase II effort will focus on developing a commercial product prototype that also oers Internet-linked monitoring by healthcare providers and an interactive patient interface that provides informational, intentional, educational, and motivational feedback to encourage and improve adherence and, correspondingly, health outcomes. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The patient community receiving LTOT numbers approximately 800,000, and the cost of their oxygen therapy alone represents approximately 30% ( 1.3 billion) of total Medicare expenditures for durable medical equipment. An objective and accurate method of measuring patient adherence to LTOT is required to augment clinical electiveness and cost containment for the long term, and for research studies to address such controversies as the benefits of LTOT in patients with intermittent hypoxemia. The proposed system will provide an elective, practical, and fordable method for reliably assessing LTOT adherence in clinical practice and research settings.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

331 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2025). Reported award amounts total $130,507,041. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Department of Energy

Contractor profile

BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.