SBIR/STTR Research Award

HIGH-ENERGY LIGHTWEIGHT INNOVATIVE OPERATIONAL SYNTHETIC-FUEL (HELIOS)

Award identifier 66c30ae43c05169704e37d40b947c00491a4290f3e6377de4d4675d0640c50e2Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$139,112

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ARCHEM, LLC
Proposal award date
2025-06-18
Contract end date
2025-12-29
UEI
H3W2KFW84SY5
Solicitation number
25.1
Topic code
N251-022

Research abstract

Archem LLC proposes to develop a high-energy-density synthetic fuel under this SBIR Phase I project, supporting the U.S. Navy’s (USN) mission to enhance cruise missile propulsion efficiency and range. This effort focuses on molecular modeling, computational simulations, small-scale synthesis, and property validation to establish feasibility. The fuel aims to exceed JP-10’s volumetric energy density while maintaining a flash point above 60°C, viscosity below 200cSt at -40°C, and improved thermal stability to reduce coking and enhance combustion efficiency.Phase I will employ an analysis-of-alternatives (AOA) modeling-first strategy, integrating density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to evaluate fuel architectures within the C12-C22 hydrocarbon range. These computational models will guide formulation selection, prioritizing molecular structures that optimize energy density, stability, and compatibility with naval propulsion systems. Machine learning-assisted blend optimization and design of experiments (DoE) will refine candidate formulations before laboratory synthesis.Following computational screening, a 250 mL prototype will be synthesized and characterized using GC-MS, NMR, and FTIR to confirm molecular composition. ASTM-compliant testing will assess heat of combustion, density, viscosity, flash point, and freezing point, ensuring alignment with USN operational criteria. Thermal stability and heat absorption capacity will be evaluated using the Compact Rapid Assessment of Fuel Thermal Integrity (CRAFTI) rig at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Energetics Research Group (ERG) to assess high-temperature decomposition and coking resistance. Comparative testing against JP-10 will quantify energy output, heat absorption efficiency, and reliability under operational conditions.At the conclusion of Phase I (Base Period, 6 months), Archem will deliver 250 mL of synthesized fuel, computational models, and a feasibility report to the USN’s Technical Point of Contact (TPOC). If successful, the Phase I Option Period (6 additional months) will extend laboratory testing, thermal validation, and cost analysis for scale-up feasibility at production-relevant levels. This structured approach ensures a strong foundation for Phase II development and future transition to operational missile platforms while considering environmental impact and maritime suitability.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2025). Reported award amounts total $3,354,086. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.