SBIR/STTR Research Award

HYALURONAN SYNTHASE GENE TRANSFER TO PREVENT RESTENOSIS

Award identifier 2af5b1a96bf31b79c2456e27acb5cdf4d55ee19056960a9f464bbb16dadbd3bdAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,877

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Endomedix, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DKP6MYX4J176
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (Verbatim From Applicant's Abstract): Stent implantation markedly reduces the observed frequency of restenosis (a phenomenon of cell proliferation after coronary angioplasty). However, in-stent restenosis is more difficult to treat than post angioplasty restenosis. No systemic pharmacological treatment has hitherto been shown to convincingly reduce the restenosis incidence in patients. It has been observed in animal studies that saturation of RHAMM and CD44 receptors by hyaluronan significantly reduces neointimal formation without cellular destruction. The applicant proposes to investigate the feasibility of using a biodegradable, biocompatible and nonthrombogenic hyaluronic acid hydrogel (HA)(crosslinked and rendered insoluble), as a metallic stent coating, for sustained transfer of plasmid DNA encoding a hyaluronan synthase gene (HASyn). This HA hydrogei will be gradually hydrolyzed, releasing HA and thus the therapeutic gene into the surrounding environment. Steady transfer of the HASyn gene to the arterial wall and the subsequent expression will theoretically sustain the high localized HA concentration. In this Phase I program, we will initially optimize the in vitro DNA release characteristics of the HA stent coating and study the longevity of its gene transfer in A10 (aortic smooth muscle cell) culture. The program will be concluded by a pilot scale efficacy study in a porcine coronary model to assess the efficiency of gene transfer and the potential for inhibition of neointimal formation following stent implantation. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL APPLICATION: In-stent restenosis have significant socioeconomic impact. Almost all the gene delivery stents currently under investigation target the destruction of proliferating smooth muscle cells. This Phase I application is to demonstrate the feasibility of using a biodegradable hydrogel metallic stent coating as a new sustained delivery therapeutic modality for delivering a therapeutic gene NOT targeting the destruction of proliferating cells (a distinct contrast to other gene delivery stents under investigation). Promising results obtained will expand this study into Phase II and thereafter clinical trial. This could result in a gene therapy stent with a unique and nondestruction mode of action.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2014). Reported award amounts total $5,483,219. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.