SBIR/STTR Research Award

ALTERNATIVE TO HEPARIN ANTICOAGULATION

Award identifier 0f416ea7b8a257052b81c5f96f3e44d20f6c5afda4e462dc6e402c4a2624449dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$0

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Thrombodyne Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
RMCNNVCMSXB1
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Anticoagulation of blood is necessary for prevention of clotting and/or thromboembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass or other procedures that require extracorporeal circulation. Conventionally, anticoagulation is achieved by administering heparin and reversed by neutralizing heparin with protamine. Both of these procedures may have potential pathological consequences. A subpopulation of patients is known to be sensitive to protamine, and heparin itself has been shown to cause thrombocytopenia in a subpopulation of patients undergoing open heart surgery. This is proposal to refine and develop an alternative to the heparin-protamine strategy. A novel device, termed clotting factor filter (CFF) has been developed that will bind and transiently remove clotting factors from circulating blood. Blood from which clotting factors have been removed would neither form clots nor thromboemboli during extracorporeal circulation, thus achieving the same effect as intended with heparin. Hypocoagulable blood gradually returns to normal state when the procedure is stopped, or recovery can be accelerated and normal hemostasis restored immediately by transfusion of autologous blood or plasma. Preliminary Phase I studies have confirmed the safety and efficacy of CFF approach. The objective of this Phase II proposal include: optimization of the CFF, characterization and performance of the optimized system, and verification that the CFF is able to effect appropriate 'anticoagulation' safely during cardiopulmonary bypass in an animal model. For the active matrix, linkers and base substrates will be investigated. For the plasma-matrix contact system, optimal column geometry will be selected, and a high-flow plasma separator will be designed. The optimal CFF system will be characterized to ascertain required level of 'anticoagulation' that will eliminate thrombosis during ECC. Finally, a porcine CPB model will be utilized to test the safety and efficacy of the CFF approach for 'anticoagulation' of blood during bypass. This will include careful assessment of hematologic and cardiovascular parameters during the procedure and during long term survival of the animal to assure that CFF approach is efficacious and safe.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2020). Reported award amounts total $7,244,075. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.